Deck 6: Police and Law

ملء الشاشة (f)
exit full mode
سؤال
Police officers must be in marked police cars when making traffic stops.
استخدم زر المسافة أو
up arrow
down arrow
لقلب البطاقة.
سؤال
The Supreme Court ruled in Tennessee v. Garner (1985) that deadly force may not be used against an unarmed and fleeing suspect unless certain circumstances warrant it.
سؤال
Borders and airports always allow searches without warrants.
سؤال
Warrants are issued after the police clearly demonstrate reasonable suspicion.
سؤال
The plain view doctrine was initially discussed in Coolidge v. New Hampshire (1971).
سؤال
Consent searches occur when there is an immediate threat to public safety or the risk that evidence will be destroyed.  In a consent search , officers may search, arrest, or question suspects without obtaining a warrant or following other usual rules of criminal procedure.
سؤال
The legal test for determining the existence of probable cause is referred to as the totality of circumstances. ​
سؤال
In Terry v. Ohio (1968) the U.S. Supreme Court established the flexible "totality of circumstances" test for determining the existence of the probable cause.
سؤال
If a person is growing marijuana in plain sight of a passing police car, a police officer does not need a warrant to search and seize the evidence.
سؤال
Most stops must be supported by reasonable suspicion; an arrest or a search warrant must be supported by enough information to constitute
probable cause.
سؤال
There is no hard-and fast definition of probable cause that can be applied to every situation.
سؤال
Probable cause must be established before an arrest warrant is issued.
سؤال
"Stops" are defined as events that violate individuals' reasonable expectations of privacy.
سؤال
An affidavit is a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation from the police officers.
سؤال
Police are not allowed to use deadly force on a fleeing suspect, even if officers believe the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious harm to others.
سؤال
The clause protecting against unreasonable search and seizure is found in the Fifth Amendment.
سؤال
Both government officials and private citizens are empowered to make stops.
سؤال
A "general warrant" for searching many locations is the most common type of warrant issued.
سؤال
A consent search provides a valuable investigatory tool for officers.
سؤال
The majority of searches take place without a warrant.
سؤال
All illegally obtained evidence will be excluded from trial based upon the exclusionary rule.
سؤال
Even if a police officer is acting in the interests of public safety, he or she must obtain a warrant before searching an area.
سؤال
Warrantless searches often take place at the entry points into the United States, including border crossings, ports, and airports.
سؤال
Prior to Miranda , police officers in some instances would torture suspects until a confession was delivered.
سؤال
In Wolf v. Colorado (1949), the Supreme Court incorporated the Fourth Amendment.
سؤال
If a police officer is acting in good faith, then he/she may use evidence obtained through the use of a defective search warrant.
سؤال
The __________ Amendment guarantees citizens protection against "unreasonable search and seizure."

A) Fourth
B) Fifth
C) Sixth
D) Eighth
E) Fourteenth
سؤال
Police are allowed to use deception when interrogating a suspect.
سؤال
Miranda warnings were established by the Supreme Court in Weeks v. U.S. (1914).
سؤال
In Nix v. Williams (1984), the U. S. Supreme Court established the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule.
سؤال
Police officers must provide Miranda warnings if they approach someone on the street and begin questioning them.
سؤال
A situation in which a police officer uses his/her authority to deprive people of their liberty or property is called a:

A) search
B) seizure
C) entrapment
D) stop
E) hold
سؤال
Consent searches are unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.
سؤال
The Miranda warnings apply only to what are called custodial interrogations.
سؤال
The good faith exception can only be used in federal cases due to U.S. v. Leon (1984).
سؤال
A brief interference with a person's freedom of movement with a duration that can be measured in minutes is called a(n):

A) search.
B) stop.
C) arrest.
D) interrogation.
E) hold.
سؤال
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) applied the exclusionary rule to the state court system.
سؤال
Miranda warnings must be read to a suspect prior to interrogation.
سؤال
The term "reasonable expectation of privacy" is most relevant to which of the following police activities?

A) Search
B) Seizure
C) Arrest
D) Stop
E) Interrogation
سؤال
Miranda warnings must be issued in written form and signed or initialed by the suspect.
سؤال
A written statement of fact, supported by oath or affirmation and submitted to judicial officers to fulfill the requirements of probable cause for obtaining a warrant, is the definition of:

A) the totality of circumstances.
B) an affidavit.
C) probable cause.
D) reasonable suspicion.
E) a stop.
سؤال
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in __________ that the totality of circumstance test should be used for determining the existence of probable cause.

A) Illinois v. Gates
B) Map v. Ohio
C) Roper v. Simmons
D) Hannity v. Patrick
E) Mapp v. Ohio
سؤال
When sufficient evidence is available to support the reasonable conclusion that a person has committed a crime, then a police officer may claim to have:

A) reasonable suspicion.
B) exigent circumstances.
C) probable cause.
D) justifiable intent.
E) permission to act.
سؤال
The phrase "no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized" may be found in which Amendment?

A) First
B) Fourth
C) Fifth
D) Sixth
E) Eighth
سؤال
Which of the following statements about search warrants is false?

A) Police officers must provide reliable information when obtaining a search warrant.
B) Police officers must identify the "things" to be searched.
C) Police officers are allowed to conduct warrantless searches under certain circumstances.
D) Police officers cannot admit evidence into court if they gather evidence using an illegal search warrant.
E) Police officers need a search warrant even if a person waives his or her Fourth Amendment rights.
سؤال
Excessive use of force violates the _________ Amendment?

A) First
B) Second
C) Third
D) Fourth
E) Fifth
سؤال
_______ ruled that police can systematically stop drivers in order to seek information.

A) Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz
B) Illinois v. Lidster
C) Delaware v. Prouse
D) City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
E) Mapp v. Ohio
سؤال
In United States v. Jones (2012)  the Supreme Court decided:

A) to make it a  requirement for the police to seek search warrants, if possible, before taking involuntary blood tests from suspected drunk drivers.
B) police do not need a warrant to search a car.
C) ​ that placing a GPS tracking device on a drug suspect's car without a warrant is a search that falls under the rules of the Fourth Amendment.
D) that arrest, even on minor offenses, makes people subject to intrusive strip searches and body cavity inspections when they are placed in jail.
E) that drug-sniffing dogs cannot be brought to the front door of a home to seek evidence that will be used to get a search warrant.
سؤال
In what circumstance is the totality of circumstances used?

A) To determine whether an offender is guilty
B) To determine whether to indict a suspect
C) To determine whether probable cause exists
D) To determine whether police acted appropriately
E) To determine whether to Mirandize a suspect
سؤال
Police officers seeking a warrant must present a(n) ______ to a judge .

A) arrest
B) affidavit
C) affluence
D) affinity
E) testament
سؤال
The _________ doctrine permits officers to notice and use as evidence items that are visible to them when they are in a location that they are permitted to be.

A) plain view
B) public safety
C) exigent circumstances
D) stop and frisk
E) Miranda
سؤال
A flexible test established by the Supreme Court for identifying whether probable cause exists that permits the judge to determine whether the available evidence is both sufficient and reliable enough to issue a warrant is the definition of:

A) the totality of circumstances.
B) an affidavit.
C) probable cause.
D) reasonable suspicion.
E) a stop.
سؤال
Someone who places a personal diary in a locked drawer within a bedroom of her home has demonstrated:

A) conditional acceptance.
B) adverse conditions.
C) a reasonable expectation of privacy.
D) strict scrutiny.
E) permissible behavior.
سؤال
Which U.S. Supreme Court case ruled that deadly force may not be used against an unarmed and fleeing suspect unless necessary to prevent their escape and unless the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of serious injury?

A) Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
B) Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
C) Tennessee v. Garner (1985)
D) Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
E) Roper v. Simmons (2005)
سؤال
Illinois v. Gates (1983) is the U.S.Supreme Court decision that established that:

A) police officers must provide reliable information when obtaining a search warrant.
B) police officers must identify the "things" to be searched.
C) police officers are allowed to conduct warrantless searches under certain circumstances.
D) police officers cannot admit evidence into court if they gather evidence using an illegal search warrant.
E) the flexible  totality of circumstances  test for determining the  existence of the probable  cause needed for obtaining a  search warrant.
سؤال
A significant deprivation of liberty, involving taking a person into custody, transporting them to a police station or jail, and processing them into the criminal justice system, is called a(n):

A) search.
B) stop.
C) arrest.
D) interrogation.
E) hold.
سؤال
To obtain an arrest warrant, police must demonstrate:

A) reasonable expectation.
B) reasonable suspicion.
C) probable cause.
D) the exclusionary rule.
E) preponderance of the evidence.
سؤال
The majority of searches take place without:

A) a search.
B) a seizure.
C) a warrant.
D) an arrest.
E) permission.
سؤال
Which of the following is not a condition for the issuance of a warrant?

A) the existence of probable cause
B) the suspect must be informed of his/her rights
C) evidence must be presented to the judicial officer and be supported by "oath or affirmation,"
D) the warrant must describe the specific place to be searched
E) the warrant must describe the person or items to be seized
سؤال
In order for a stop to be permissible, officers must have:

A) reasonable suspicion.
B) probable cause.
C) legal insight.
D) preponderance of the evidence.
E) reasonable doubt.
سؤال
Terry v. Ohio endorsed:

A) warrantless searches for weapons.
B) victim's rights.
C) stop-and-frisk searches.
D) due process requirements.
E) witness safety procedures.
سؤال
Which would not permit a warrantless search?

A) Driving across the Canadian-U.S. border.
B) Sailing through a border seaport.
C) Suspicion of drugs in a known addict's apartment .
D) An international airport.
E) ​ Driving across the Mexican-U.S. border.
سؤال
A ________ search allows officers to conduct a permissible warrantless search of a person, vehicle, home, or location after receiving permission from the person in question.

A) no knock
B) consent
C) nonconsent
D) permissible
E) Terry
سؤال
The Supreme Court decision that endorsed warrantless searches for weapons and evidence in the immediate vicinity of people who are lawfully arrested was:

A) Florida v. Jardines  (2013).
B) Bailey v. United States (2013).
C) Chimel v. California (1969).
D) Maryland v. King (2013).
E) Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders (2012).
سؤال
When there is an immediate threat to public safety or the risk that evidence will be destroyed , officers may search, arrest, or question suspects without obtaining a warrant.  This is termed:

A) exigent circumstances.
B) the exclusionary rule.
C) due process.
D) totality of circumstances.
E) probable cause.
سؤال
In which U.S. Supreme Court case was it established that criminal defendants must be read their rights?

A) Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
B) Terry v. Ohio (1968)
C) Chimel v. California (1969)
D) Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
E) Maryland v. Wilson (1997)
سؤال
According to the Supreme Court, exigent circumstances might exist when:

A) officers believe they might find important evidence.
B) officers believe there is probable cause.
C) officers believe others might be in grave danger.
D) officers do not want to wait for a warrant.
E) officers are friendly with the suspects.
سؤال
_______ ruled that random stops by officers on patrol are not constitutional.

A) Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz
B) Illinois v. Lidster
C) Delaware v. Prouse
D) City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
E) Mapp v. Ohio
سؤال
Which of the following types of searches is related to the search of an automobile?

A) Consent search.
B) Sobriety checkpoint.
C) Inventory search.
D) Plain view search.
E) Search incident to an arrest
سؤال
In which case did the Supreme Court endorse a police officer's authority to stop-and-frisk suspects on the streets when there is reasonable suspicion that they are armed and involved in criminal activity.

A) Florida v. Jardines  (2013)
B) Bailey v. United States (2013)
C) Terry v. Ohio (1968)
D) Maryland v. King (2013)
E) Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders (2012)
سؤال
In the case of U.S. v. Drayton (2002), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police officers:

A) must notify citizens they have the right to say "no" to a search.
B) must notify a citizen of his/her right against self-incrimination.
C) must notify a citizen of his/her right to an attorney.
D) are not obligated to notify citizens they have a right to say "no" to a search.
E) are not obligated to read citizens their rights prior to arrest.
سؤال
Terry v. Ohio endorsed stop-and-frisk searches to ensure _______.

A) officer safety
B) victim's rights
C) suspect rights
D) due process
E) witness safety
سؤال
According to ________, a suspect who, during a frisk, which is not justified by proper observation and reasonable suspicion , is found to be carrying drugs or weapons can seek to have the evidence excluded.

A) exigent circumstances
B) the exclusionary rule
C) due process
D) the totality of circumstances
E) probable cause
سؤال
Which of the following is not a required component of the Miranda warnings?

A) Notification that suspects have the right to an attorney during interrogation.
B) Notification that suspects have the right to remain silent.
C) Notification that any statement suspects make can be used against them in court.
D) Notification that the state will pay for an attorney if suspects cannot afford one.
E) Notification that suspects have the right to a speedy trial.
سؤال
Which of the following is not a way to legally conduct a search without a warrant?

A) Special needs search
B) Stop-and-frisk search
C) Automobile search
D) Supervisor enforced search
E) Witness statement search
سؤال
A "pat down" search is also known as a _________ search.

A) stop-and-frisk
B) Miranda
C) reasonable suspicion
D) totality of circumstances
E) plain view
سؤال
Which two decisions by the Court laid the foundation for Miranda v. Arizona (1966)?

A) Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) and Massiah v. U. S. (1964)
B) Mapp v. Ohio (1961) and Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
C) Wolf v. Colorado (1949) and Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
D) Wolf v. Colorado (1949) and Rochin v. California (1952)
E) Maryland v. Wilson (1957) and Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
سؤال
Permissible warrantless search of a vehicle that has been impounded so that police can make a record of the items contained in the vehicle is known as a(n):

A) plain view search.
B) probable cause search.
C) inventory search.
D) seizure.
E) search incident to arrest.
سؤال
In ________, the Supreme Court endorsed warrantless searches for weapons and evidence in the immediate vicinity of people who are lawfully arrested.

A) Mapp v. Ohio
B) Terry v. Ohio
C) Chimel v. Ohio
D) Chimel v. California
E) Roper v. Simmons
سؤال
During a traffic stop, officers can order passengers as well as the driver to exit the vehicle, even if there is no basis for suspicion that the passengers engaged in any wrongdoing according to:

A) Carroll v. U.S. (1925)
B) Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990)
C) Maryland v. Wilson (1997)
D) Georgia v. Randolph (2006)
E) California v. Acevedo (1991)
فتح الحزمة
قم بالتسجيل لفتح البطاقات في هذه المجموعة!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/141
auto play flashcards
العب
simple tutorial
ملء الشاشة (f)
exit full mode
Deck 6: Police and Law
1
Police officers must be in marked police cars when making traffic stops.
False
2
The Supreme Court ruled in Tennessee v. Garner (1985) that deadly force may not be used against an unarmed and fleeing suspect unless certain circumstances warrant it.
True
3
Borders and airports always allow searches without warrants.
True
4
Warrants are issued after the police clearly demonstrate reasonable suspicion.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
5
The plain view doctrine was initially discussed in Coolidge v. New Hampshire (1971).
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
6
Consent searches occur when there is an immediate threat to public safety or the risk that evidence will be destroyed.  In a consent search , officers may search, arrest, or question suspects without obtaining a warrant or following other usual rules of criminal procedure.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
7
The legal test for determining the existence of probable cause is referred to as the totality of circumstances. ​
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
8
In Terry v. Ohio (1968) the U.S. Supreme Court established the flexible "totality of circumstances" test for determining the existence of the probable cause.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
9
If a person is growing marijuana in plain sight of a passing police car, a police officer does not need a warrant to search and seize the evidence.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
10
Most stops must be supported by reasonable suspicion; an arrest or a search warrant must be supported by enough information to constitute
probable cause.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
11
There is no hard-and fast definition of probable cause that can be applied to every situation.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
12
Probable cause must be established before an arrest warrant is issued.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
13
"Stops" are defined as events that violate individuals' reasonable expectations of privacy.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
14
An affidavit is a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation from the police officers.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
15
Police are not allowed to use deadly force on a fleeing suspect, even if officers believe the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious harm to others.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
16
The clause protecting against unreasonable search and seizure is found in the Fifth Amendment.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
17
Both government officials and private citizens are empowered to make stops.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
18
A "general warrant" for searching many locations is the most common type of warrant issued.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
19
A consent search provides a valuable investigatory tool for officers.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
20
The majority of searches take place without a warrant.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
21
All illegally obtained evidence will be excluded from trial based upon the exclusionary rule.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
22
Even if a police officer is acting in the interests of public safety, he or she must obtain a warrant before searching an area.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
23
Warrantless searches often take place at the entry points into the United States, including border crossings, ports, and airports.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
24
Prior to Miranda , police officers in some instances would torture suspects until a confession was delivered.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
25
In Wolf v. Colorado (1949), the Supreme Court incorporated the Fourth Amendment.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
26
If a police officer is acting in good faith, then he/she may use evidence obtained through the use of a defective search warrant.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
27
The __________ Amendment guarantees citizens protection against "unreasonable search and seizure."

A) Fourth
B) Fifth
C) Sixth
D) Eighth
E) Fourteenth
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
28
Police are allowed to use deception when interrogating a suspect.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
29
Miranda warnings were established by the Supreme Court in Weeks v. U.S. (1914).
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
30
In Nix v. Williams (1984), the U. S. Supreme Court established the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
31
Police officers must provide Miranda warnings if they approach someone on the street and begin questioning them.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
32
A situation in which a police officer uses his/her authority to deprive people of their liberty or property is called a:

A) search
B) seizure
C) entrapment
D) stop
E) hold
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
33
Consent searches are unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
34
The Miranda warnings apply only to what are called custodial interrogations.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
35
The good faith exception can only be used in federal cases due to U.S. v. Leon (1984).
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
36
A brief interference with a person's freedom of movement with a duration that can be measured in minutes is called a(n):

A) search.
B) stop.
C) arrest.
D) interrogation.
E) hold.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
37
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) applied the exclusionary rule to the state court system.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
38
Miranda warnings must be read to a suspect prior to interrogation.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
39
The term "reasonable expectation of privacy" is most relevant to which of the following police activities?

A) Search
B) Seizure
C) Arrest
D) Stop
E) Interrogation
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
40
Miranda warnings must be issued in written form and signed or initialed by the suspect.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
41
A written statement of fact, supported by oath or affirmation and submitted to judicial officers to fulfill the requirements of probable cause for obtaining a warrant, is the definition of:

A) the totality of circumstances.
B) an affidavit.
C) probable cause.
D) reasonable suspicion.
E) a stop.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
42
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in __________ that the totality of circumstance test should be used for determining the existence of probable cause.

A) Illinois v. Gates
B) Map v. Ohio
C) Roper v. Simmons
D) Hannity v. Patrick
E) Mapp v. Ohio
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
43
When sufficient evidence is available to support the reasonable conclusion that a person has committed a crime, then a police officer may claim to have:

A) reasonable suspicion.
B) exigent circumstances.
C) probable cause.
D) justifiable intent.
E) permission to act.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
44
The phrase "no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized" may be found in which Amendment?

A) First
B) Fourth
C) Fifth
D) Sixth
E) Eighth
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
45
Which of the following statements about search warrants is false?

A) Police officers must provide reliable information when obtaining a search warrant.
B) Police officers must identify the "things" to be searched.
C) Police officers are allowed to conduct warrantless searches under certain circumstances.
D) Police officers cannot admit evidence into court if they gather evidence using an illegal search warrant.
E) Police officers need a search warrant even if a person waives his or her Fourth Amendment rights.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
46
Excessive use of force violates the _________ Amendment?

A) First
B) Second
C) Third
D) Fourth
E) Fifth
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
47
_______ ruled that police can systematically stop drivers in order to seek information.

A) Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz
B) Illinois v. Lidster
C) Delaware v. Prouse
D) City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
E) Mapp v. Ohio
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
48
In United States v. Jones (2012)  the Supreme Court decided:

A) to make it a  requirement for the police to seek search warrants, if possible, before taking involuntary blood tests from suspected drunk drivers.
B) police do not need a warrant to search a car.
C) ​ that placing a GPS tracking device on a drug suspect's car without a warrant is a search that falls under the rules of the Fourth Amendment.
D) that arrest, even on minor offenses, makes people subject to intrusive strip searches and body cavity inspections when they are placed in jail.
E) that drug-sniffing dogs cannot be brought to the front door of a home to seek evidence that will be used to get a search warrant.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
49
In what circumstance is the totality of circumstances used?

A) To determine whether an offender is guilty
B) To determine whether to indict a suspect
C) To determine whether probable cause exists
D) To determine whether police acted appropriately
E) To determine whether to Mirandize a suspect
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
50
Police officers seeking a warrant must present a(n) ______ to a judge .

A) arrest
B) affidavit
C) affluence
D) affinity
E) testament
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
51
The _________ doctrine permits officers to notice and use as evidence items that are visible to them when they are in a location that they are permitted to be.

A) plain view
B) public safety
C) exigent circumstances
D) stop and frisk
E) Miranda
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
52
A flexible test established by the Supreme Court for identifying whether probable cause exists that permits the judge to determine whether the available evidence is both sufficient and reliable enough to issue a warrant is the definition of:

A) the totality of circumstances.
B) an affidavit.
C) probable cause.
D) reasonable suspicion.
E) a stop.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
53
Someone who places a personal diary in a locked drawer within a bedroom of her home has demonstrated:

A) conditional acceptance.
B) adverse conditions.
C) a reasonable expectation of privacy.
D) strict scrutiny.
E) permissible behavior.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
54
Which U.S. Supreme Court case ruled that deadly force may not be used against an unarmed and fleeing suspect unless necessary to prevent their escape and unless the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of serious injury?

A) Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
B) Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
C) Tennessee v. Garner (1985)
D) Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
E) Roper v. Simmons (2005)
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
55
Illinois v. Gates (1983) is the U.S.Supreme Court decision that established that:

A) police officers must provide reliable information when obtaining a search warrant.
B) police officers must identify the "things" to be searched.
C) police officers are allowed to conduct warrantless searches under certain circumstances.
D) police officers cannot admit evidence into court if they gather evidence using an illegal search warrant.
E) the flexible  totality of circumstances  test for determining the  existence of the probable  cause needed for obtaining a  search warrant.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
56
A significant deprivation of liberty, involving taking a person into custody, transporting them to a police station or jail, and processing them into the criminal justice system, is called a(n):

A) search.
B) stop.
C) arrest.
D) interrogation.
E) hold.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
57
To obtain an arrest warrant, police must demonstrate:

A) reasonable expectation.
B) reasonable suspicion.
C) probable cause.
D) the exclusionary rule.
E) preponderance of the evidence.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
58
The majority of searches take place without:

A) a search.
B) a seizure.
C) a warrant.
D) an arrest.
E) permission.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
59
Which of the following is not a condition for the issuance of a warrant?

A) the existence of probable cause
B) the suspect must be informed of his/her rights
C) evidence must be presented to the judicial officer and be supported by "oath or affirmation,"
D) the warrant must describe the specific place to be searched
E) the warrant must describe the person or items to be seized
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
60
In order for a stop to be permissible, officers must have:

A) reasonable suspicion.
B) probable cause.
C) legal insight.
D) preponderance of the evidence.
E) reasonable doubt.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
61
Terry v. Ohio endorsed:

A) warrantless searches for weapons.
B) victim's rights.
C) stop-and-frisk searches.
D) due process requirements.
E) witness safety procedures.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
62
Which would not permit a warrantless search?

A) Driving across the Canadian-U.S. border.
B) Sailing through a border seaport.
C) Suspicion of drugs in a known addict's apartment .
D) An international airport.
E) ​ Driving across the Mexican-U.S. border.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
63
A ________ search allows officers to conduct a permissible warrantless search of a person, vehicle, home, or location after receiving permission from the person in question.

A) no knock
B) consent
C) nonconsent
D) permissible
E) Terry
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
64
The Supreme Court decision that endorsed warrantless searches for weapons and evidence in the immediate vicinity of people who are lawfully arrested was:

A) Florida v. Jardines  (2013).
B) Bailey v. United States (2013).
C) Chimel v. California (1969).
D) Maryland v. King (2013).
E) Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders (2012).
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
65
When there is an immediate threat to public safety or the risk that evidence will be destroyed , officers may search, arrest, or question suspects without obtaining a warrant.  This is termed:

A) exigent circumstances.
B) the exclusionary rule.
C) due process.
D) totality of circumstances.
E) probable cause.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
66
In which U.S. Supreme Court case was it established that criminal defendants must be read their rights?

A) Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
B) Terry v. Ohio (1968)
C) Chimel v. California (1969)
D) Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
E) Maryland v. Wilson (1997)
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
67
According to the Supreme Court, exigent circumstances might exist when:

A) officers believe they might find important evidence.
B) officers believe there is probable cause.
C) officers believe others might be in grave danger.
D) officers do not want to wait for a warrant.
E) officers are friendly with the suspects.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
68
_______ ruled that random stops by officers on patrol are not constitutional.

A) Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz
B) Illinois v. Lidster
C) Delaware v. Prouse
D) City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
E) Mapp v. Ohio
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
69
Which of the following types of searches is related to the search of an automobile?

A) Consent search.
B) Sobriety checkpoint.
C) Inventory search.
D) Plain view search.
E) Search incident to an arrest
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
70
In which case did the Supreme Court endorse a police officer's authority to stop-and-frisk suspects on the streets when there is reasonable suspicion that they are armed and involved in criminal activity.

A) Florida v. Jardines  (2013)
B) Bailey v. United States (2013)
C) Terry v. Ohio (1968)
D) Maryland v. King (2013)
E) Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders (2012)
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
71
In the case of U.S. v. Drayton (2002), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police officers:

A) must notify citizens they have the right to say "no" to a search.
B) must notify a citizen of his/her right against self-incrimination.
C) must notify a citizen of his/her right to an attorney.
D) are not obligated to notify citizens they have a right to say "no" to a search.
E) are not obligated to read citizens their rights prior to arrest.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
72
Terry v. Ohio endorsed stop-and-frisk searches to ensure _______.

A) officer safety
B) victim's rights
C) suspect rights
D) due process
E) witness safety
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
73
According to ________, a suspect who, during a frisk, which is not justified by proper observation and reasonable suspicion , is found to be carrying drugs or weapons can seek to have the evidence excluded.

A) exigent circumstances
B) the exclusionary rule
C) due process
D) the totality of circumstances
E) probable cause
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
74
Which of the following is not a required component of the Miranda warnings?

A) Notification that suspects have the right to an attorney during interrogation.
B) Notification that suspects have the right to remain silent.
C) Notification that any statement suspects make can be used against them in court.
D) Notification that the state will pay for an attorney if suspects cannot afford one.
E) Notification that suspects have the right to a speedy trial.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
75
Which of the following is not a way to legally conduct a search without a warrant?

A) Special needs search
B) Stop-and-frisk search
C) Automobile search
D) Supervisor enforced search
E) Witness statement search
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
76
A "pat down" search is also known as a _________ search.

A) stop-and-frisk
B) Miranda
C) reasonable suspicion
D) totality of circumstances
E) plain view
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
77
Which two decisions by the Court laid the foundation for Miranda v. Arizona (1966)?

A) Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) and Massiah v. U. S. (1964)
B) Mapp v. Ohio (1961) and Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
C) Wolf v. Colorado (1949) and Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
D) Wolf v. Colorado (1949) and Rochin v. California (1952)
E) Maryland v. Wilson (1957) and Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
78
Permissible warrantless search of a vehicle that has been impounded so that police can make a record of the items contained in the vehicle is known as a(n):

A) plain view search.
B) probable cause search.
C) inventory search.
D) seizure.
E) search incident to arrest.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
79
In ________, the Supreme Court endorsed warrantless searches for weapons and evidence in the immediate vicinity of people who are lawfully arrested.

A) Mapp v. Ohio
B) Terry v. Ohio
C) Chimel v. Ohio
D) Chimel v. California
E) Roper v. Simmons
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
80
During a traffic stop, officers can order passengers as well as the driver to exit the vehicle, even if there is no basis for suspicion that the passengers engaged in any wrongdoing according to:

A) Carroll v. U.S. (1925)
B) Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990)
C) Maryland v. Wilson (1997)
D) Georgia v. Randolph (2006)
E) California v. Acevedo (1991)
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
locked card icon
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 141 في هذه المجموعة.