Deck 15: Negligence: Defenses

ملء الشاشة (f)
exit full mode
سؤال
Before comparative negligence was adopted, contributory negligence barred recovery in most cases.
استخدم زر المسافة أو
up arrow
down arrow
لقلب البطاقة.
سؤال
The last clear chance rule

A) is an offset against comparative negligence
B) applies only if there is an assumption of the risk
C) can prevent contributory negligence from barring recovery by the plaintiff
D) establishes strict liability
سؤال
In a case of secondary assumption of the risk, the fault of the plaintiff is compared to that of the defendant and the damages are allocated according to the comparison of fault.
سؤال
Contributory negligence is determined by an objective test, while assumption of the risk is determined by a subjective test.
سؤال
The failure of the plaintiff to take reasonable steps to avoid the consequence of the defendant's negligence is an example of contributory negligence.
سؤال
Match between columns
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
contributory negligence
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
avoidable consequences
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
assumption of the risk
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
express assumption of the risk
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
defense
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
ordinary negligence
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
public policy
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
comparative negligence
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
adhesion contract
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
last clear chance
سؤال
In contributory negligence, the damages between the plaintiff and defendant are allocated according to their relative fault.
سؤال
Under the defense of contributory negligence

A) The defendant's unreasonableness bars the plaintiff's recovery.
B) Recovery by the plaintiff is not defeated.
C) The defendant's unreasonableness is compared to that of the plaintiff.
D) Recovery by the plaintiff is defeated.
سؤال
Match between columns
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
contributory negligence
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
avoidable consequences
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
assumption of the risk
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
express assumption of the risk
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
defense
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
ordinary negligence
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
public policy
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
comparative negligence
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
adhesion contract
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
last clear chance
سؤال
Match between columns
damages allocated according to relative fault
contributory negligence
damages allocated according to relative fault
avoidable consequences
damages allocated according to relative fault
assumption of the risk
damages allocated according to relative fault
express assumption of the risk
damages allocated according to relative fault
defense
damages allocated according to relative fault
ordinary negligence
damages allocated according to relative fault
public policy
damages allocated according to relative fault
comparative negligence
damages allocated according to relative fault
adhesion contract
damages allocated according to relative fault
last clear chance
سؤال
The defense of ________ is being raised when the defendant argues that the plaintiff should have known of the danger to him- or herself.
سؤال
In an express assumption of the risk, the victim knowingly and voluntarily accepts the risk by express agreement.
سؤال
Under comparative negligence

A) The plaintiff's recovery is barred.
B) The plaintiff's recovery can be reduced in proportion to the fault of the parties.
C) The plaintiff's recovery can be increased in proportion if the defendant was negligent per se.
D) Recovery is not barred if there was an assumption of the risk.
سؤال
Match between columns
customs and societal values
contributory negligence
customs and societal values
avoidable consequences
customs and societal values
assumption of the risk
customs and societal values
express assumption of the risk
customs and societal values
defense
customs and societal values
ordinary negligence
customs and societal values
public policy
customs and societal values
comparative negligence
customs and societal values
adhesion contract
customs and societal values
last clear chance
سؤال
The reason that primary assumption of the risk is a complete defense (and not a basis for comparative fault) is that the plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily accepted a particular risk that the defendant did not have a duty to protect the plaintiff against.
سؤال
________ negligence is the failure to use even a small amount of care to avoid foreseeable harm.
سؤال
Match between columns
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
contributory negligence
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
avoidable consequences
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
assumption of the risk
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
express assumption of the risk
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
defense
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
ordinary negligence
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
public policy
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
comparative negligence
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
adhesion contract
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
last clear chance
سؤال
Match between columns
a response stating why a claim should be denied
contributory negligence
a response stating why a claim should be denied
avoidable consequences
a response stating why a claim should be denied
assumption of the risk
a response stating why a claim should be denied
express assumption of the risk
a response stating why a claim should be denied
defense
a response stating why a claim should be denied
ordinary negligence
a response stating why a claim should be denied
public policy
a response stating why a claim should be denied
comparative negligence
a response stating why a claim should be denied
adhesion contract
a response stating why a claim should be denied
last clear chance
سؤال
The defense of ________ is being raised when the defendant argues that the plaintiff knew about and accepted the danger.
سؤال
The two major categories of comparative negligence are ________ comparative negligence and ________ comparative negligence.
سؤال
After the adoption of comparative negligence, why is there no longer a need for the last clear chance defense?
سؤال
Give an example of an express assumption of the risk that violates public policy and hence is invalid.
سؤال
Match between columns
contractual limitation of liability
contributory negligence
contractual limitation of liability
avoidable consequences
contractual limitation of liability
assumption of the risk
contractual limitation of liability
express assumption of the risk
contractual limitation of liability
defense
contractual limitation of liability
ordinary negligence
contractual limitation of liability
public policy
contractual limitation of liability
comparative negligence
contractual limitation of liability
adhesion contract
contractual limitation of liability
last clear chance
سؤال
Match between columns
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
contributory negligence
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
avoidable consequences
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
assumption of the risk
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
express assumption of the risk
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
defense
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
ordinary negligence
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
public policy
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
comparative negligence
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
adhesion contract
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
last clear chance
سؤال
Distinguish between primary assumption of the risk and secondary assumption of the risk.
سؤال
Match between columns
mitigation of damages
contributory negligence
mitigation of damages
avoidable consequences
mitigation of damages
assumption of the risk
mitigation of damages
express assumption of the risk
mitigation of damages
defense
mitigation of damages
ordinary negligence
mitigation of damages
public policy
mitigation of damages
comparative negligence
mitigation of damages
adhesion contract
mitigation of damages
last clear chance
سؤال
Define comparative negligence.
سؤال
What is an adhesion contract?
سؤال
Match between columns
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
contributory negligence
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
avoidable consequences
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
assumption of the risk
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
express assumption of the risk
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
defense
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
ordinary negligence
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
public policy
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
comparative negligence
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
adhesion contract
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
last clear chance
فتح الحزمة
قم بالتسجيل لفتح البطاقات في هذه المجموعة!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/29
auto play flashcards
العب
simple tutorial
ملء الشاشة (f)
exit full mode
Deck 15: Negligence: Defenses
1
Before comparative negligence was adopted, contributory negligence barred recovery in most cases.
True
2
The last clear chance rule

A) is an offset against comparative negligence
B) applies only if there is an assumption of the risk
C) can prevent contributory negligence from barring recovery by the plaintiff
D) establishes strict liability
C
3
In a case of secondary assumption of the risk, the fault of the plaintiff is compared to that of the defendant and the damages are allocated according to the comparison of fault.
True
4
Contributory negligence is determined by an objective test, while assumption of the risk is determined by a subjective test.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
5
The failure of the plaintiff to take reasonable steps to avoid the consequence of the defendant's negligence is an example of contributory negligence.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
6
Match between columns
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
contributory negligence
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
avoidable consequences
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
assumption of the risk
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
express assumption of the risk
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
defense
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
ordinary negligence
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
public policy
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
comparative negligence
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
adhesion contract
had the last opportunity to avoid the accident
last clear chance
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
7
In contributory negligence, the damages between the plaintiff and defendant are allocated according to their relative fault.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
8
Under the defense of contributory negligence

A) The defendant's unreasonableness bars the plaintiff's recovery.
B) Recovery by the plaintiff is not defeated.
C) The defendant's unreasonableness is compared to that of the plaintiff.
D) Recovery by the plaintiff is defeated.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
9
Match between columns
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
contributory negligence
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
avoidable consequences
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
assumption of the risk
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
express assumption of the risk
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
defense
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
ordinary negligence
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
public policy
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
comparative negligence
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
adhesion contract
standardized agreement where bargaining was nonexistent
last clear chance
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
10
Match between columns
damages allocated according to relative fault
contributory negligence
damages allocated according to relative fault
avoidable consequences
damages allocated according to relative fault
assumption of the risk
damages allocated according to relative fault
express assumption of the risk
damages allocated according to relative fault
defense
damages allocated according to relative fault
ordinary negligence
damages allocated according to relative fault
public policy
damages allocated according to relative fault
comparative negligence
damages allocated according to relative fault
adhesion contract
damages allocated according to relative fault
last clear chance
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
11
The defense of ________ is being raised when the defendant argues that the plaintiff should have known of the danger to him- or herself.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
12
In an express assumption of the risk, the victim knowingly and voluntarily accepts the risk by express agreement.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
13
Under comparative negligence

A) The plaintiff's recovery is barred.
B) The plaintiff's recovery can be reduced in proportion to the fault of the parties.
C) The plaintiff's recovery can be increased in proportion if the defendant was negligent per se.
D) Recovery is not barred if there was an assumption of the risk.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
14
Match between columns
customs and societal values
contributory negligence
customs and societal values
avoidable consequences
customs and societal values
assumption of the risk
customs and societal values
express assumption of the risk
customs and societal values
defense
customs and societal values
ordinary negligence
customs and societal values
public policy
customs and societal values
comparative negligence
customs and societal values
adhesion contract
customs and societal values
last clear chance
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
15
The reason that primary assumption of the risk is a complete defense (and not a basis for comparative fault) is that the plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily accepted a particular risk that the defendant did not have a duty to protect the plaintiff against.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
16
________ negligence is the failure to use even a small amount of care to avoid foreseeable harm.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
17
Match between columns
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
contributory negligence
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
avoidable consequences
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
assumption of the risk
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
express assumption of the risk
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
defense
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
ordinary negligence
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
public policy
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
comparative negligence
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
adhesion contract
unreasonable conduct that is not reckless or gross
last clear chance
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
18
Match between columns
a response stating why a claim should be denied
contributory negligence
a response stating why a claim should be denied
avoidable consequences
a response stating why a claim should be denied
assumption of the risk
a response stating why a claim should be denied
express assumption of the risk
a response stating why a claim should be denied
defense
a response stating why a claim should be denied
ordinary negligence
a response stating why a claim should be denied
public policy
a response stating why a claim should be denied
comparative negligence
a response stating why a claim should be denied
adhesion contract
a response stating why a claim should be denied
last clear chance
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
19
The defense of ________ is being raised when the defendant argues that the plaintiff knew about and accepted the danger.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
20
The two major categories of comparative negligence are ________ comparative negligence and ________ comparative negligence.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
21
After the adoption of comparative negligence, why is there no longer a need for the last clear chance defense?
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
22
Give an example of an express assumption of the risk that violates public policy and hence is invalid.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
23
Match between columns
contractual limitation of liability
contributory negligence
contractual limitation of liability
avoidable consequences
contractual limitation of liability
assumption of the risk
contractual limitation of liability
express assumption of the risk
contractual limitation of liability
defense
contractual limitation of liability
ordinary negligence
contractual limitation of liability
public policy
contractual limitation of liability
comparative negligence
contractual limitation of liability
adhesion contract
contractual limitation of liability
last clear chance
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
24
Match between columns
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
contributory negligence
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
avoidable consequences
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
assumption of the risk
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
express assumption of the risk
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
defense
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
ordinary negligence
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
public policy
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
comparative negligence
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
adhesion contract
knowingly and voluntarily accepting the danger
last clear chance
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
25
Distinguish between primary assumption of the risk and secondary assumption of the risk.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
26
Match between columns
mitigation of damages
contributory negligence
mitigation of damages
avoidable consequences
mitigation of damages
assumption of the risk
mitigation of damages
express assumption of the risk
mitigation of damages
defense
mitigation of damages
ordinary negligence
mitigation of damages
public policy
mitigation of damages
comparative negligence
mitigation of damages
adhesion contract
mitigation of damages
last clear chance
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
27
Define comparative negligence.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
28
What is an adhesion contract?
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
29
Match between columns
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
contributory negligence
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
avoidable consequences
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
assumption of the risk
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
express assumption of the risk
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
defense
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
ordinary negligence
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
public policy
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
comparative negligence
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
adhesion contract
plaintiff recovers nothing because his or her own negligence helps cause his or her injury
last clear chance
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
locked card icon
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 29 في هذه المجموعة.