Deck 13: Interrogations, Admissions, and Confessions

Question 1

Which of the following factors is relevant in deciding whether the defendant's confession was voluntary?

A) The defendant's intelligence
B) The existence of threats or false promises
C) The location and duration of the interrogation session
D) The defendant's intelligence, the existence of threats or false promises, and the location and duration of the interrogation session

Answer 1

D

Question 2

Suspects who are interrogated without being Mirandized first:

A) may have the evidence ruled inadmissible, but will not be able to win a Section 1983 civil rights lawsuit.
B) may have the evidence ruled inadmissible and may be able to win a Section 1983 civil rights lawsuit.
C) will have the evidence ruled admissible, but may be able to win a Section 1983 civil rights lawsuit.
D) have no equitable or compensatory recourse available to them.

Answer 2

A

Question 3

A suspect admits that she killed her husband but that he deserved it because he was unfaithful.This statement is

A) a confession.
B) an admission.
C) an affidavit.
D) a deposition.

Answer 3

A

Question 4

A suspect states,"I was in the car,but I didn't know it was stolen." This is

A) a confession.
B) a perpetration.
C) an admission.
D) a deposition.

Question 5

?Which of the following statements is true?

A) In all situations where questioning occurs at a police station, the person questioned is considered "in custody".
B) In all situations where questioning occurs in the interrogation room of a police station, the person questioned is considered "in custody".
C) In all situations where questioning occurs at a jail or in a prison, the person questioned is considered "in custody".
D) "In custody" determinations are not made based entirely on location. Custody is determined by examining, from a reasonable person's point of view, the totality of facts and circumstances surrounding an encounter between a person and law enforcement authorities.

Question 6

Which of the following tactics,if used by police,would probably not render a confession involuntary by the courts?

A) Continued interrogation of an injured, depressed, or medicated person in extreme pain in a hospital setting.
B) Deprivation of food or sleep to a suspect.
C) Relay and continued questioning for an extended period of time.
D) A police officer tells a lie about evidence to the suspect during the interrogation.

Question 7

Police attempt to interrogate a criminal suspect at the police station prior to any court appearance.The suspect states unequivocally that he wants an attorney present during the questioning.Which of the following is a true statement?

A) Police can legally attempt to coerce or badger the suspect into waiving his previously asserted Miranda rights while held in uninterrupted Miranda custody since the first refusal to waive.
B) If the suspect is released from Miranda custody and returned to his normal life for some time, generally 14 days, police are legally permitted to attempt the interrogation again.
C) Police can ignore the request for an attorney if the suspect has not been placed under formal arrest.
D) Police cannot attempt an interrogation of the suspect under any circumstances.

Question 8

Failure to comply with Miranda requirements

A) conclusively establishes voluntariness of a subsequent confession.
B) has no bearing on the voluntariness of a subsequent confession.
C) conclusively establishes involuntariness of a subsequent confession.
D) does not per se render a confession involuntary.

Question 9

?The essential ingredient which must be present for a statement to be involuntary is

A) pain.
B) police physical brutality.
C) police coerciveness in some form.
D) suspect's physical or mental impairment.

Question 10

When governmental coercion is at issue,most courts examine the voluntariness of a Miranda waiver by inquiring about:

A) the suspect's capacity for self-determination was critically impaired.
B) whether force was used.
C) whether psychological coercion was used.
D) whether it was produced by police threats of violence.

Question 11

Police are questioning a suspect about a crime.Miranda warnings are read to the suspect and the suspect clearly indicates he wishes to remain silent.The police:

A) are, from this point forward, forever barred from asking questions of the suspect related to the crime in question and other crimes.
B) must immediately respect the decision and stop with questioning, but may continue questioning about the crime, and possibly other crimes, after a significant amount of time passes and after re-reading the Miranda warnings prior to subsequent interrogations.
C) may ignore verbal requests to remain silent, unless in writing.
D) must immediately contact an attorney for the criminal suspect.

Question 12

?A criminal suspect is arrested and subsequently confesses to a crime.The court determines that the Miranda requirements were violated during the interrogation,but that the statements were given voluntarily.At trial:

A) the prosecution cannot reference any statements from the confession for any reason.
B) the prosecution cannot reference any statements to impeach the defendant's testimony, but can reference the confession during the prosecution's case-in-chief.
C) the prosecution can reference any statements from the confession to impeach the defendant's testimony, but cannot reference the confession during the prosecution's case-in-chief
D) the prosecution can reference the confession during its case-in-chief and to impeach testimony by the defendant.

Question 13

?To have a valid waiver of a person's Miranda rights,the waiver must:

A) be voluntarily made and must be made in front of a non -law enforcement officer witness.
B) be voluntarily made and must be made with full awareness of the consequences of the waiver.
C) be acknowledged by a judge and must be made with full awareness of the consequences of the waiver.
D) must only be voluntarily made.

Question 14

What conditions must be present to trigger Miranda warnings?

A) accusation and confinement
B) intelligently and knowingly
C) custody and interrogation
D) reasonable suspicion and detention

Question 15

After obtaining a waiver of a suspect's rights police start the process of interrogating a criminal suspect about a particular crime.After a few questions are asked,the suspect clearly and unambiguously communicates her desire to talk to an attorney.The police:

A) cannot, from this point forward, take any steps to deliberately elicit incriminating statements.
B) cannot, from this point forward, take any steps to deliberately elicit incriminating statements unless the criminal suspect initiates the contact.
C) can ignore the request because it was not put forth in writing.
D) can ignore the request because it was made after an initial waiver of rights was secured.

Question 16

What is the essential reason why the right to counsel under the 5th Amendment is less restrictive on the role of the police than the right to counsel under the 6th Amendment?

A) The right to counsel under the 5th Amendment can be waived, but the right cannot be waived under the 6th Amendment.
B) The 6th Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, the 5th Amendment is not.
C) The 6th Amendment concerns rights after criminal charges have been formally filed.
D) The "due process" provisions of the 5th Amendment are less enforceable in court than the provisions of the 6th Amendment.

Question 17

Police detectives begin to interrogate a criminal suspect without having read the Miranda warnings.During this initial questioning,the suspect makes an incriminating statement.The detectives,after hearing the incriminating statement,make the suspect aware of his Miranda rights.Questioning continues and the suspect repeats the incriminating information.

A) The incriminating statement is inadmissible.
B) The incriminating statement is admissible, but any derivative evidence that can be gathered from the information in the statement is inadmissible.
C) The incriminating statement is inadmissible, but any derivative evidence that can be gathered from the information in the statement is admissible.
D) The incriminating statement is admissible, as is any derivative evidence that can be gathered from the information in the statement.

Question 18

When considering the issue of waiver of Miranda rights,courts take into consideration:

A) the totality of circumstances.
B) whether the waiver was voluntary (absence of police coercion).
C) awareness of the right(s) being waived and the consequences of the waiver.
D) the totality of circumstances, whether the waiver was voluntary (absence of police coercion), and awareness of the right(s) being waived and the consequences of the waiver.

Question 19

Officers place George Jetson under arrest,but they don't immediately read the Miranda warnings.George immediately breaks down and confesses to the crime without any prompting from the officers.George's confession is:

A) inadmissible because when people are placed under arrest, Miranda warnings must be read.
B) inadmissible because officers are required to read Miranda warnings whenever dealing with persons during any type of police-citizen interaction.
C) admissible because this type of statement is beyond the reach of Miranda.
D) admissible because the police did nothing to break the will of the suspect.

Question 20

A police interrogator conducted an interrogation of Ben Wright without reading him his Miranda warnings.During the interrogation,Mr.Wright voluntarily confessed to a crime and informed the interrogator of the whereabouts of the weapon used in the crime.The weapon was discovered at the provided location,and the suspect's prints were on the weapon.Based on the U.S.Supreme Court interpretation of Miranda,which of the following is a true statement?

A) The confession, but not the weapon, will be admitted into evidence.
B) The weapon, but not the confession, will be admitted into evidence.
C) Both the weapon and the confession will be admitted into evidence.
D) Neither the weapon, nor the confession, will be admitted into evidence.

Question 21

The Sixth Amendment's deliberate elicitation standard is broader than the protections afforded suspects under the Fifth Amendment because it prohibits authorities from engaging in conduct that would not be considered "interrogation" or its functional equivalent under Miranda.

Question 22

Police interrogate an inexperienced,young person with a mental disorder and obtain a confession.A court may never use this statement in any capacity.

Question 23

Miranda warnings are required to be given anytime a person is arrested.

Question 24

?An officer is conducting an investigation and has become particularly suspicious of a certain person to the point of concentrating all the investigative methods and inquiries on proving that that suspect is the perpetrator.The officer is about to question the suspect (who does not realize she is suspected of the crime)in the suspect's home.For any statements to be admissible

A) the officer must give Miranda warnings because custody exists when he starts the questioning.
B) the officer must give Miranda warnings because the suspect is the focus of the investigation.
C) the officer must give Miranda warnings if he informs the person she is a suspect.
D) the officer need not give Miranda warnings even if he informs the person she is a suspect, so long as the officer does not create a coercive atmosphere.

Question 25

When a court is in the process of judging voluntariness of a confession and the issue is the impact of age and mental capacity,the court evaluates any evidence on the basis of:

A) whether the presence of the circumstances impacted the will of the suspect.
B) whether a person of a particular age or mental capacity is capable of exercising good judgment.
C) whether the parent of the suspect was present during questioning.
D) whether the interrogator engaged in deceitful practices during the interrogation.

Question 26

Under limited conditions,subsequent interrogation of a suspect who exercised the Miranda right of silence after being given warnings may be permissible.

Question 27

Violations of Miranda rights produce fewer consequences compared to those that are normally triggered by other violations of constitutional criminal procedure rights.

Question 28

The major issues of Miranda hinge on the meaning of four terms.Which of the following is NOT one of those four?

A) custody
B) interrogation
C) warning
D) arrest

Question 29

The police must observe the requirements imposed by the Miranda rule only when

A) the suspect is in custody at the time of the interrogation.
B) the interrogation takes place at the police station.
C) the suspect has already been charged with the offense for which he or she is being interrogated.
D) the suspect is in custody at the time of the interrogation and the interrogation takes place at the police station.

Question 30

In which of the following situations would the suspect be considered "in custody" for Miranda warning purposes?

A) While being questioned during an investigatory stop
B) While being transported to the police station in a patrol car subsequent to an arrest
C) While being questioned in jail by a police undercover agent posing as an inmate
D) While being questioned during an investigatory stop and frisk

Question 31

What kind of test is used to determine if a person is in custody?

A) If the officer intends to arrest the suspect
B) If the suspect doesn't feel free to leave
C) If a reasonable person wouldn't feel free to leave
D) If the detention is more than brief questioning

Question 32

Miranda warnings are required to be given anytime a person is in custody.

Question 33

A defendant's silence after receiving Miranda warnings can be used against a defendant at trial in the prosecution's case-in-chief,but not for the purpose of impeachment.

Question 34

The Supreme Court has stated the "questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way" is known as

A) custodial interrogation
B) superficial interrogation
C) confessions
D) interviews

Question 35

Both confessions and admissions are incriminating statements.

Question 36

Volunteered statements

A) should be interrupted for Miranda warnings.
B) need not be interrupted for Miranda warnings.
C) need to be interrupted for Miranda warnings if the Edwards rule applies.
D) need to be interrupted for Miranda warnings if the person is in custody.

Question 37

Interrogation means

A) police questioning.
B) that a person is in custody and questioned about anything.
C) even volunteered statements to police.
D) any words or actions by police that they should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.

Question 38

Miranda warnings are required to be given anytime a person is about to be questioned by police for any information,including basic questioning that occurs before a person is identified as a suspect.

Question 39

A confession produced by police threatening violence but not touching the suspect is nevertheless a violation of due process.

Question 40

A suspect has been formally charged with a crime (either through prosecutor information or grand jury indictment).The suspect has been assigned defense counsel.While in police custody,the suspect contacts police detectives requesting a meeting to discuss the charges and evidence.The police:

A) can meet the suspect for interrogation, but not deliberately elicit evidence, without notifying the suspect's defense attorney.
B) can meet the suspect for deliberate elicitation of evidence, but not interrogation, without notifying the suspect's defense attorney.
C) must contact the suspect's attorney.
D) can meet with the suspect, without the attorney present, if the judge gives permission.

Question 41

Name two of the unexpected benefits of the Miranda decision that were not foreseen at the time.

Question 42

The term ___________ is a broad term meaning simply any oral or written declaration or assertion.

Question 43

The voluntary and intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege is known as a(n)_______________.

Question 44

________________ occurs when state officials create "a situation likely to induce ...incriminating statements without the assistance of counsel ...."

Question 45

The warnings required by Miranda must be given before police question a person who is in custody or deprived of his or her _______________________________.

Question 46

In reference to admissibility of confessions,the case which shifted the area of inquiry from due process to the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is ______________.

Question 47

Explain the "focus of investigation test" of Escobedo v.Illinois,1964,that preceded the Miranda decision.

Question 48

Explain how trickery and deception can be used by the police and how they might affect voluntariness.

Question 49

Define these terms: statement,admission,interrogation,and confession.

Question 50

Explain the difference between the right to counsel under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.What are the distinct limitations placed on obtaining statements from a suspect under each approach.

Question 51

Describe and provide a court case as an example to illustrate Miranda's limitation regarding testimonial evidence.

Question 52

What is the Miranda Warning?

Question 53

The ____________is a(n)exception to Miranda's usual warning requirements,where the need for answers to questions in situations posing a threat to society outweighs the need to protect the Fifth Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination.

Question 54

Do Terry-type investigative stops and ordinary traffic stops require a Miranda warning by the police? Explain why or why not.

Question 55

Provide a definition of "custody."

Question 56

The term _____________ means an interrogation of a suspect cut off from the rest of the world in a police-dominated atmosphere.It often results in self-incriminating statements being made without full warnings of constitutional rights.

Question 57

Briefly explain the right to counsel clause of the Sixth Amendment.

Question 58

The essential ingredient which must be present for a statement to be considered involuntary is __________.

Question 59

Sometimes,suspects specifically invoke their Miranda rights in a narrow way,while acting in a manner that suggests they impliedly waive their Miranda rights with regard to other aspects of a case.These are referred to as _______________.

Question 60

Some courts have ruled that a confession produced by ___________ is not necessarily involuntary.