Deck 4: Criminal Law

ملء الشاشة (f)
exit full mode
سؤال
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil is called a(n):

A)Alibi.
B)Procedural defense.
C)Justification.
D)Insanity.
استخدم زر المسافة أو
up arrow
down arrow
لقلب البطاقة.
سؤال
The state of mind that accompanies a criminal act is:

A)Actus Reus.
B)Mens Rea.
C)An inchoate offense.
D)Concurrence.
سؤال
Before a person may be charged with a crime it must first be established that a crime has been committed.This violation is called:

A)Actus Reus.
B)Mens Rea.
C)Inchoate offense.
D)Concurrence.
سؤال
The Latin term that indicates that a crime has been committed and literally means the body of the crime is:

A)Corpus delicti.
B)Stare decisis.
C)Ex post facto.
D)Criminalus Bodem.
سؤال
Which of the following is a justification defense?

A)Duress
B)Insanity
C)Double jeopardy
D)Self-defense
سؤال
Typically civil lawsuits seek:

A)To punish a wrongdoer.
B)Compensation.
C)To deter others from committing a similar offense.
D)To protect society.
سؤال
A criminal's reason for committing a crime is commonly known as:

A)Attendant circumstances.
B)Procedural.
C)Concurrence.
D)Motive.
سؤال
The U.S.Constitution prohibits the enactment of ________________ laws which makes acts committed before the laws in question were passed punishable as crimes.

A)Stare decisis
B)Corpus delicti
C)Ex post facto
D)Mens Rea
سؤال
What term expresses the belief that a society must be governed by established principles to maintain order?

A)Rule of law
B)Stare decisis
C)Codification
D)Inchoate
سؤال
Diminished Capacity is a:

A)Procedure.
B)Verdict.
C)Rule of law.
D)Defense.
سؤال
By definition the criminal act and the mental state occur together in order for a crime to take place.This is known as:

A)Actus Reus.
B)Mens Rea.
C)An inchoate offense.
D)Concurrence.
سؤال
Which of the following types of law occurs when public order is compromised for wrongs against society as a whole?

A)Tort law
B)Administrative law
C)Civil law
D)Criminal law
سؤال
Which Constitutional Amendment guarantees the right to a speedy trial?

A)Fourth
B)Sixth
C)Fifth
D)Eighth
سؤال
Originally created in 1871 and the basis for gauging insanity defense,the _________ is still used today in our court system.

A)Durham Rule
B)Browner Rule
C)Procedural Rule
D)GBMI Rule
سؤال
Which of the following would not be categorized as a felony?

A)Robbery
B)Murder
C)Simple assault
D)Rape
سؤال
.Search and seizure,arrest procedures,and general rules of evidence are considered:

A)Substantive law.
B)Procedural law.
C)Administrative law.
D)Civil law.
سؤال
A Tort action occurs under:

A)Case law.
B)Procedural law.
C)Civil law.
D)Double jeopardy.
سؤال
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S.Constitution says that no person may be tried twice for the same offense.This is known as:

A)Ex post facto.
B)Entrapment.
C)Double jeopardy.
D)Stare decisis.
سؤال
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future decisions is known as:

A)Precedent.
B)Statutory law.
C)Procedure.
D)Case law.
سؤال
Which of the following types of law is based on the assumption that acts injure not just individuals,but society as a whole?

A)Tort law
B)Administrative law
C)Civil law
D)Criminal law
سؤال
A misdemeanor is a criminal offense punishable by death or by incarceration in a prison facility for at least one year.
سؤال
Penal code is the written or codified law;the "law on the books," as enacted by a government body or agency having the power to make laws.
سؤال
Case law is the body of judicial precedent,historically built on legal reasoning and past interpretations of statutory laws,that serves as a guide to decision making,especially in the courts.
سؤال
The Latin term for the facts that show that a crime has occurred,the term literally means "the body of the crime," is known as _______________ delecti.
سؤال
Judicial precedent,historically built on legal reasoning and past interpretations of statutory laws that serves as a guide to decision making especially in the courts is known as ___________ law.
سؤال
A legal defense based on claims of mental illness or mental incapacity is known as the___________ defense.
سؤال
____________ force is the degree of force that is appropriate in a given situation and is not excessive.
سؤال
The M'Naghten rule is a rule for determining insanity,which asks whether the defendant knew what he or she was doing or whether or not the defendant knew that what he or she was doing was wrong.
سؤال
An alibi is a statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed,or so engaged in other provable activities,that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible.
سؤال
Procedural law is the branch of modern law that governs relationships between parties.
سؤال
Denial of a speedy trial is an example of a procedural defense.
سؤال
Civil law is the part of the law that specifies the methods to be used in enforcing substantive law and is part of the criminal law system.
سؤال
Criminal ___________ occurs when a person fails to reasonably perceive the substantial and unjustifiable risks of dangerous consequences of his or her actions.
سؤال
A justification defense occurs when the defendant admits the crime,but claims it was necessary to do so to avoid a greater evil.
سؤال
Common law originates from usage and custom rather than from written statutes.The term refers to an unwritten body of judicial opinion,originally developed by English courts,that is based on non-statutory customs,traditions,and precedents that help guide judicial decision making.
سؤال
Statutory law is the written,organized,and compiled form of the criminal laws of a jurisdiction.
سؤال
Double Jeopardy allows a defendant to collect double damages in a civil suit.
سؤال
______________ is an improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement.
سؤال
Entrapment is a proper and legal inducement to allow someone to commit a crime by agents of law enforcement.
سؤال
Corpus delicti literally means "the body of the crime."
سؤال
List and define the five categories of criminal law violations.Give examples of each category of law.
سؤال
What is the purpose of law? Would a society exist without laws? Comment on and analyze the pros and cons of these issues giving examples to support your opinions.
سؤال
As defenses,justifications claim a kind of moral high ground.Justifications may be offered by people who find themselves forced to choose between "two evils." Generally speaking,conduct that a person believes is necessary to avoid harm to him or to another is justifiable if the harm he is trying to avoid is greater than the harm the law defining the offense seeks to avoid.Define and comment on three of the six categories that are applicable to this defense.Analyze their good and bad points.
سؤال
Compare and contrast the difference between felonies,misdemeanors,and infractions.
سؤال
A rule for gauging insanity that was originally created in 1871 by a New Hampshire court is known as the ____________________ Rule.
سؤال
The Constitution prohibits the enactment of laws,which make acts committed before the laws in question were passed punishable as crimes.Ex __________ facto is the Latin term closely associated with this prohibition.
سؤال
______________ capacity is a defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be used to exonerate the defendant of guilt.
سؤال
The M'Naghten rule,the Durham rule,and the Brawner rule all are connected with insanity defense in criminal court.Define each rule and emphasize the difference between the three.
سؤال
Prosecutorial Misconduct is an example of a _____________ defense.
سؤال
Procedural defenses make the claim that the defendant was in some manner discriminated against in the justice process or that some important aspect of official procedure was not properly followed.List and define four of these defenses while commenting on their good and bad points.
سؤال
By definition a criminal action requires actus reus,mens rea,and concurrence to occur.Define and gives examples of these three actions.
سؤال
Match between columns
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Defense
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Alibi
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Justification
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Excuse
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Law
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Prosecutorial misconduct
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Entrapment
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Double jeopardy
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Diminished capacity
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Precedent
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Defense
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Alibi
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Justification
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Excuse
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Law
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Prosecutorial misconduct
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Entrapment
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Double jeopardy
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Diminished capacity
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Precedent
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Defense
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Alibi
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Justification
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Excuse
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Law
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Prosecutorial misconduct
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Entrapment
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Double jeopardy
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Diminished capacity
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Precedent
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Defense
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Alibi
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Justification
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Excuse
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Law
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Prosecutorial misconduct
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Entrapment
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Double jeopardy
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Diminished capacity
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Precedent
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Defense
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Alibi
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Justification
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Excuse
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Law
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Prosecutorial misconduct
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Entrapment
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Double jeopardy
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Diminished capacity
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Precedent
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Defense
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Alibi
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Justification
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Excuse
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Law
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Prosecutorial misconduct
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Entrapment
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Double jeopardy
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Diminished capacity
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Precedent
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Defense
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Alibi
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Justification
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Excuse
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Law
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Prosecutorial misconduct
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Entrapment
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Double jeopardy
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Diminished capacity
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Precedent
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Defense
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Alibi
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Justification
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Excuse
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Law
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Prosecutorial misconduct
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Entrapment
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Double jeopardy
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Diminished capacity
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Precedent
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Defense
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Alibi
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Justification
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Excuse
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Law
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Prosecutorial misconduct
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Entrapment
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Double jeopardy
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Diminished capacity
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Precedent
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Defense
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Alibi
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Justification
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Excuse
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Law
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Prosecutorial misconduct
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Entrapment
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Double jeopardy
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Diminished capacity
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Precedent
فتح الحزمة
قم بالتسجيل لفتح البطاقات في هذه المجموعة!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/52
auto play flashcards
العب
simple tutorial
ملء الشاشة (f)
exit full mode
Deck 4: Criminal Law
1
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil is called a(n):

A)Alibi.
B)Procedural defense.
C)Justification.
D)Insanity.
C
2
The state of mind that accompanies a criminal act is:

A)Actus Reus.
B)Mens Rea.
C)An inchoate offense.
D)Concurrence.
B
3
Before a person may be charged with a crime it must first be established that a crime has been committed.This violation is called:

A)Actus Reus.
B)Mens Rea.
C)Inchoate offense.
D)Concurrence.
A
4
The Latin term that indicates that a crime has been committed and literally means the body of the crime is:

A)Corpus delicti.
B)Stare decisis.
C)Ex post facto.
D)Criminalus Bodem.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
5
Which of the following is a justification defense?

A)Duress
B)Insanity
C)Double jeopardy
D)Self-defense
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
6
Typically civil lawsuits seek:

A)To punish a wrongdoer.
B)Compensation.
C)To deter others from committing a similar offense.
D)To protect society.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
7
A criminal's reason for committing a crime is commonly known as:

A)Attendant circumstances.
B)Procedural.
C)Concurrence.
D)Motive.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
8
The U.S.Constitution prohibits the enactment of ________________ laws which makes acts committed before the laws in question were passed punishable as crimes.

A)Stare decisis
B)Corpus delicti
C)Ex post facto
D)Mens Rea
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
9
What term expresses the belief that a society must be governed by established principles to maintain order?

A)Rule of law
B)Stare decisis
C)Codification
D)Inchoate
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
10
Diminished Capacity is a:

A)Procedure.
B)Verdict.
C)Rule of law.
D)Defense.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
11
By definition the criminal act and the mental state occur together in order for a crime to take place.This is known as:

A)Actus Reus.
B)Mens Rea.
C)An inchoate offense.
D)Concurrence.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
12
Which of the following types of law occurs when public order is compromised for wrongs against society as a whole?

A)Tort law
B)Administrative law
C)Civil law
D)Criminal law
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
13
Which Constitutional Amendment guarantees the right to a speedy trial?

A)Fourth
B)Sixth
C)Fifth
D)Eighth
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
14
Originally created in 1871 and the basis for gauging insanity defense,the _________ is still used today in our court system.

A)Durham Rule
B)Browner Rule
C)Procedural Rule
D)GBMI Rule
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
15
Which of the following would not be categorized as a felony?

A)Robbery
B)Murder
C)Simple assault
D)Rape
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
16
.Search and seizure,arrest procedures,and general rules of evidence are considered:

A)Substantive law.
B)Procedural law.
C)Administrative law.
D)Civil law.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
17
A Tort action occurs under:

A)Case law.
B)Procedural law.
C)Civil law.
D)Double jeopardy.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
18
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S.Constitution says that no person may be tried twice for the same offense.This is known as:

A)Ex post facto.
B)Entrapment.
C)Double jeopardy.
D)Stare decisis.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
19
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future decisions is known as:

A)Precedent.
B)Statutory law.
C)Procedure.
D)Case law.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
20
Which of the following types of law is based on the assumption that acts injure not just individuals,but society as a whole?

A)Tort law
B)Administrative law
C)Civil law
D)Criminal law
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
21
A misdemeanor is a criminal offense punishable by death or by incarceration in a prison facility for at least one year.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
22
Penal code is the written or codified law;the "law on the books," as enacted by a government body or agency having the power to make laws.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
23
Case law is the body of judicial precedent,historically built on legal reasoning and past interpretations of statutory laws,that serves as a guide to decision making,especially in the courts.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
24
The Latin term for the facts that show that a crime has occurred,the term literally means "the body of the crime," is known as _______________ delecti.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
25
Judicial precedent,historically built on legal reasoning and past interpretations of statutory laws that serves as a guide to decision making especially in the courts is known as ___________ law.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
26
A legal defense based on claims of mental illness or mental incapacity is known as the___________ defense.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
27
____________ force is the degree of force that is appropriate in a given situation and is not excessive.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
28
The M'Naghten rule is a rule for determining insanity,which asks whether the defendant knew what he or she was doing or whether or not the defendant knew that what he or she was doing was wrong.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
29
An alibi is a statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed,or so engaged in other provable activities,that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
30
Procedural law is the branch of modern law that governs relationships between parties.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
31
Denial of a speedy trial is an example of a procedural defense.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
32
Civil law is the part of the law that specifies the methods to be used in enforcing substantive law and is part of the criminal law system.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
33
Criminal ___________ occurs when a person fails to reasonably perceive the substantial and unjustifiable risks of dangerous consequences of his or her actions.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
34
A justification defense occurs when the defendant admits the crime,but claims it was necessary to do so to avoid a greater evil.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
35
Common law originates from usage and custom rather than from written statutes.The term refers to an unwritten body of judicial opinion,originally developed by English courts,that is based on non-statutory customs,traditions,and precedents that help guide judicial decision making.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
36
Statutory law is the written,organized,and compiled form of the criminal laws of a jurisdiction.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
37
Double Jeopardy allows a defendant to collect double damages in a civil suit.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
38
______________ is an improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
39
Entrapment is a proper and legal inducement to allow someone to commit a crime by agents of law enforcement.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
40
Corpus delicti literally means "the body of the crime."
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
41
List and define the five categories of criminal law violations.Give examples of each category of law.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
42
What is the purpose of law? Would a society exist without laws? Comment on and analyze the pros and cons of these issues giving examples to support your opinions.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
43
As defenses,justifications claim a kind of moral high ground.Justifications may be offered by people who find themselves forced to choose between "two evils." Generally speaking,conduct that a person believes is necessary to avoid harm to him or to another is justifiable if the harm he is trying to avoid is greater than the harm the law defining the offense seeks to avoid.Define and comment on three of the six categories that are applicable to this defense.Analyze their good and bad points.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
44
Compare and contrast the difference between felonies,misdemeanors,and infractions.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
45
A rule for gauging insanity that was originally created in 1871 by a New Hampshire court is known as the ____________________ Rule.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
46
The Constitution prohibits the enactment of laws,which make acts committed before the laws in question were passed punishable as crimes.Ex __________ facto is the Latin term closely associated with this prohibition.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
47
______________ capacity is a defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be used to exonerate the defendant of guilt.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
48
The M'Naghten rule,the Durham rule,and the Brawner rule all are connected with insanity defense in criminal court.Define each rule and emphasize the difference between the three.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
49
Prosecutorial Misconduct is an example of a _____________ defense.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
50
Procedural defenses make the claim that the defendant was in some manner discriminated against in the justice process or that some important aspect of official procedure was not properly followed.List and define four of these defenses while commenting on their good and bad points.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
51
By definition a criminal action requires actus reus,mens rea,and concurrence to occur.Define and gives examples of these three actions.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
52
Match between columns
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Defense
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Alibi
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Justification
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Excuse
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Law
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Prosecutorial misconduct
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Entrapment
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Double jeopardy
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Diminished capacity
Describes actions undertaken by prosecutors that give the government an unfair advantage or that prejudice the rights of a defendant or a witness
Precedent
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Defense
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Alibi
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Justification
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Excuse
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Law
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Prosecutorial misconduct
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Entrapment
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Double jeopardy
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Diminished capacity
A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, which proscribes or mandates certain forms of behavior
Precedent
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Defense
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Alibi
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Justification
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Excuse
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Law
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Prosecutorial misconduct
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Entrapment
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Double jeopardy
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Diminished capacity
A legal defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of the act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law
Precedent
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Defense
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Alibi
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Justification
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Excuse
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Law
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Prosecutorial misconduct
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Entrapment
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Double jeopardy
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Diminished capacity
A common law and constitutional prohibition against a second trial for the same offense
Precedent
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Defense
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Alibi
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Justification
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Excuse
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Law
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Prosecutorial misconduct
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Entrapment
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Double jeopardy
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Diminished capacity
An improper or illegal inducement to crime by agents of law enforcement. Also, a defense that may be raised when such inducements have occurred.
Precedent
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Defense
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Alibi
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Justification
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Excuse
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Law
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Prosecutorial misconduct
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Entrapment
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Double jeopardy
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Diminished capacity
Evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorney to show why the defendant should not be held liable for a criminal charge
Precedent
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Defense
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Alibi
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Justification
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Excuse
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Law
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Prosecutorial misconduct
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Entrapment
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Double jeopardy
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Diminished capacity
A defense based on claims of a mental condition that may be insufficient to exonerate the defendant of guilt but that may be relevant to specific mental elements of certain crimes or degrees of crime
Precedent
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Defense
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Alibi
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Justification
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Excuse
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Law
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Prosecutorial misconduct
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Entrapment
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Double jeopardy
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Diminished capacity
A statement or contention by an individual charged with a crime that he or she was so distant when the crime was committed, or so engaged in other provable activities, that his or her participation in the commission of that crime was impossible
Precedent
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Defense
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Alibi
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Justification
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Excuse
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Law
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Prosecutorial misconduct
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Entrapment
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Double jeopardy
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Diminished capacity
A legal principle that ensures that previous judicial decisions are authoritatively considered and incorporated into future cases
Precedent
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Defense
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Alibi
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Justification
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Excuse
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Law
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Prosecutorial misconduct
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Entrapment
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Double jeopardy
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Diminished capacity
A legal defense in which the defendant admits to committing the act in question but claims it was necessary in order to avoid some greater evil
Precedent
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
locked card icon
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 52 في هذه المجموعة.