The 2009 appellate court ruling in Plame Wilson v.Central Intelligence Agency best illustrates the point that

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The 2009 appellate court ruling in Plame Wilson v. Central Intelligence Agency found that government employees who sign secrecy agreements may be subject to prior restraints, meaning that they may be prevented from disclosing certain information. In this case, Valerie Plame Wilson was a CIA officer whose identity was leaked to the press, and the court ruled that the CIA could prevent her from disclosing certain information because of her agreement to keep that information confidential.

The 2009 Appellate Court Ruling in Plame Wilson V