Professional football teams have both a coach and a general manager. The general manager is usually responsible for the general operations of the organization and maintains the decision rights for selecting personnel on the football team. The coach is responsible for the training of the football team and making decisions on game day. Many coaches have been unhappy with their relationship with the general manager and feel they should have more decision rights in choosing the players on the team. Some of the top coaches are now insisting on also being general managers.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of separating the duties of the coach and general manager with respect to selecting members of the football team?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is The advantages of allowing the coach to make personnel choices include personal knowledge about the skills of the players. The coach that has been around the league for many years has directly observed the different players. Also, coaches are generally evaluated on the win/loss record of the team. The coach can't completely control whether a team wins when the coach is not able to choose players. The coach also knows with which players he or she is compatible.
On the other hand, coaches generally don't have the perspective of the owners of the organization. It is the responsibility of the general manager to direct the team according to the wishes of the owners. The coach may want the best players, but the owners don't always have the money to pay the high salaries of top players. General managers may also have more of a long-term view about the progress of the team. General managers usually have longer-term employment contracts with the team than coaches.

Professional Football Teams Have Both a Coach and a General