In Samsonite v.United States,the court found that:
A) Samsonite luggage was causing serious injury to the Canadian luggage market.
B) processing of the metal strips was a fabrication, and therefore not qualified for duty-free treatment.
C) the processing of the metal strips was a mere assembly and therefore qualified for duty-free treatment.
D) Samsonite luggage did not cause serious injury to the Mexican luggage industry.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q31: For most products undergoing a transformation in
Q32: A free trade area is:
A) two countries
Q33: Goods that may not contain any non-North
Q34: Under NAFTA as a common market for
Q35: Harmonized tariff schedules break down product classifications
Q37: Which of the following statements is untrue
Q38: U.S.businesspeople complain that the quality of manufactured
Q39: An argument that was used in support
Q40: NAFTA's national treatment principle states:
A) all goods
Q41: Regarding NAFTA's investment provisions:
A) domestically owned companies
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents