In 2014 the Supreme Court Ruled in McCullen V

In 2014 the Supreme Court ruled in McCullen v. Coakley that a Massachusetts law establishing a thirty-five-foot buffer between anti-abortion protestors and abortion clinics

A) was unconstitutional because it violated the protestors' free speech rights.
B) was unconstitutional because abortion rights have not yet been protected by the Constitution.
C) was unconstitutional because it was in conflict with a federal law regulating protests.
D) was constitutional because the protestors could use speech that would lead to imminent lawless action.
E) was constitutional because states have a duty to protect women from possible harm from protestors.