The four companies that sell bulk-rate diesel to farmers in the Saskatoon area have consistently moved together (up or down) with the same prices.It has been suggested that they have conspired together to keep prices the same.Might they be prosecuted under the Competitions Act?
A) Yes,they might be,since there is prima facie evidence of a conspiracy.
B) Yes,they might be,since this is a good example of the practice of parallel pricing.
C) No,they would not be,because the conspiracy cannot be implied.
D) No,they would not be,because their intent must be proved.
E) Yes,they might be,because an agreement can be inferred from the actual behaviour.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: The Canada Consumer Product Safety Act (CCPSA)applies
Q23: For the merger of two large competing
Q25: Tied-selling is an example of monopolizing.
Q28: Parallel pricing is an example of monopolizing.
Q29: The fact that prices among competitors in
Q30: Any agreement that lessens or has the
Q32: Consumer protection statutes create regulatory offences that
Q35: Bait-and-switch advertising is both a criminal and
Q36: Which of the following statements is true
Q43: Why is there a need to make
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents