Does the requirement for a plaintiff in a negligent case to prove foreseeability make sense? Should not a defendant be responsible for all the actual consequences of the careless conduct? Is it fair that an injured party might be able to recover from no one?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q136: Persons who engage in abnormally dangerous activities:
A)
Q137: The legal effect of the presence of
Q138: In the Palsgraf case,foreseeability was an issue.What
Q139: Bart Steveman is sitting in the first
Q140: Which of the following torts allows a
Q142: The proximate cause requirement for a negligence
Q143: Cindy was riding her bicycle on a
Q144: Discuss how the doctrine of strict liability
Q145: Powdersurf is a manufacturer of snowboards.Powdersurf is
Q146: Gloria goes to a local used car
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents