In Lindholm V

In Lindholm v.Brandt,when Malmberg sold Lindholm's "Red Elvis" to Brandt,the court found that:

A) Malmberg had stolen the artwork, so he couldn't pass his void title to Brandt.
B) Malmberg had stolen the artwork and could pass the void title to Brandt because Brandt qualified as a good faith purchaser.
C) Malmberg had been entrusted with the artwork but had a void title because he breached the terms of the entrustment so he couldn't pass good title to Brandt.
D) Malmberg had been entrusted with the artwork and could pass the void title to Brandt because Brandt qualified as a good faith purchaser.
E) Malmberg had been entrusted with the artwork and could pass the voidable title to Brandt because Brandt qualified as a good faith purchaser.