What did the court decide in Medlock v.Mitchell,when explaining how to determine whether a will was executed under "undue influence?"
A) The proof of the existence of a confidential relationship is enough for the court to determine that undue influence occurred.
B) Because the will was prepared using the services of an attorney, the likelihood of undue influence is non-existent.
C) The presence of the beneficiaries at the time that the will and trust amendments were executed is circumstantial evidence that there was undue influence.
D) Circumstantial evidence alone is not enough to presume undue influence.
E) If a person possesses another's power of attorney, there is no undue influence because of the rights conferred upon the holder.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q85: State law may exempt physicians from civil
Q86: A(n)_ adoption occurs when a person adopts
Q87: A(n)_ is an order of the court
Q88: Which of the following is not a
Q89: A _ marriage is one in which
Q91: In the case of In the Matter
Q92: What is the legal effect of a
Q93: Which of the following does not revoke
Q94: Which of the following is true about
Q95: A document signed by a person that
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents