Services
Discover
Homeschooling
Ask a Question
Log in
Sign up
Filters
Done
Question type:
Essay
Multiple Choice
Short Answer
True False
Matching
Topic
Business
Study Set
The Law and Business
Quiz 5: Professional Liability: the Legal Challenges
Path 4
Access For Free
Share
All types
Filters
Study Flashcards
Practice Exam
Learn
Question 21
True/False
Like any other standard of care,the standard of care for professionals evolves and changes as the law evolves and changes.
Question 22
Multiple Choice
If a fiduciary duty exists,the law imposes additional requirements on a professional beyond those set out in any contract or required under tort law.These requirements include all of the following EXCEPT
Question 23
True/False
If a client sues a professional for failing to exercise reasonable care in giving advice,but the client has suffered no damage as a result,the professional will not be liable.
Question 24
True/False
Normal standards of care always apply to professionals who undertake a task beyond the usual skills of the profession.
Question 25
True/False
Liability for breach of a fiduciary duty may arise even where there has been no negligence.
Question 26
True/False
Generally speaking,all professional organizations have a number of the same responsibilities.
Question 27
True/False
A professional may owe a duty of care in tort to someone other than the client.
Question 28
Multiple Choice
Brayden had a long history of intestinal disorder.After several failed non-invasive treatments,it was suggested to him that he undergo a colonoscopy as a means of better diagnosing his problem.He spent five minutes prior to the procedure consulting with the doctor who performed the colonoscopy.He was told by the doctor that these procedures usually are simple and for the most part problem-free.Brayden agreed to undergo the procedure.During the course of the colonoscopy his bowel was perforated and he was required to undergo a significant open surgical procedure to save his life.Brayden sued the doctor for lack of informed consent.At trial,the expert evidence established that the risks of bowel perforation were material risks and as such ought to have been disclosed.Brayden in fact testified that had he been told of the risk of bowel perforation he would have not undergone the colonoscopy.However,the judge hearing the case made a finding that a reasonable person with Brayden's condition having been properly informed of all the risks would have undergone the colonoscopy.In these circumstances,the judge will likely then proceed to
Question 29
Multiple Choice
A disclaimer is
Question 30
Multiple Choice
Which of the following is NOT true?
Question 31
True/False
A fiduciary duty may exist in the absence of a contractual duty.
Question 32
True/False
The duty of a professional to take reasonable care does not include a duty not to omit essential matters.
Question 33
True/False
Damages for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty are based on the same principle.
Question 34
True/False
If the plaintiff has suffered no damages,a defendant who has breached a fiduciary duty will not be held liable.
Question 35
True/False
Provincial legislation sometimes creates a statutory cause of action for damages arising from misrepresentations.
Question 36
True/False
In the case of breach of fiduciary duty,a defendant may be under a duty to account for any profits derived from the breach as an alternative to damages.
Question 37
True/False
Where two professionals have specialized knowledge and skill in the same profession,representation of one by the other negates the usual standard of care for the professional who is representing the other.