In Samson v.California (2006) ,the Supreme Court ruled that:
A) a police officer is prohibited from conducting a suspicionless search of a parolee.
B) a police officer is not prohibited from conducting a suspicionless search of a parolee.
C) a police officer can conduct a suspicionless search of a parolee if the parolee is searched in a public place.
D) a police officer must have reasonable suspicion in order to search a parolee.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: The need to protect police from possible
Q27: The objective basis for inventory searches consists
Q33: To do a body cavity search at
Q36: The court considered all of the following
Q37: DNA testing of incarcerated felons:
A)has been declared
Q39: Which of the following is TRUE?
A)Every state
Q40: The Supreme Court has not applied the
Q42: The Supreme Court has not addressed the
Q52: Probationers and parolees have diminished Fourth Amendment
Q58: Special needs searches can never result in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents