In Graham v Conner (1989) ,Graham was a diabetic who was essentially stopped and arrested after police thought something was wrong when Graham left a convenience store abruptly.As it turned out,he was trying to find some sugar for his diabetic condition,but the line was too long,so he left.Appearing drunk (due to the hypoglycemic condition) ,he was arrested and denied sugar or orange juice,and was basically "roughed up" by the police.The court said:
A) The use of force was not excessive and upheld the conviction for being drunk in public.
B) The police were justified in using force but should have given him the juice.However,the conviction stood.
C) The use of force was excessive and the case was remanded back to the lower court.
D) The police were justified in "roughing up" Graham and denying him any sugar or orange juice because it would have been "unreasonable" for the police to stop in the middle of an arrest and get him relief.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: Probable cause deals with:
A)hunches and suspicions.
B)an exact
Q10: In building probable cause,police officers may rely
Q11: Which of the following represents first-hand information
Q12: Draper v.U.S.established that an anonymous tip can_be
Q13: When an official takes a person into
Q15: The U.S.Supreme Court decided in Tennessee v.Garner
Q15: In building probable cause, police officers may
Q16: The majority of arrests:
A)do not require a
Q18: Payton v.New York ruled which of the
Q19: In regard to seizures,the Supreme Court in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents