In 2000,the U.S.Supreme Court ruled that police roadblocks where people were stopped without individualized suspicion in order to discover and intercept drugs were unconstitutional.In its opinion,the Court acknowledged its earlier 1990 decision in which sobriety checkpoints were constitutional even though drivers were stopped without individualized suspicion.Are the outcomes in these two cases consistent? How do you think they should have been decided?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In 2000,the U.S.Supreme Court ruled that police roadblocks where people were stopped without individualized suspicion in order to discover and intercept drugs were unconstitutional.In its opinion,the Court acknowledged its earlier 1990 decision in which sobriety checkpoints were constitutional even though drivers were stopped without individualized suspicion.Are the outcomes in these two cases consistent? How do you think they should have been decided?