Researchers compared the levels of hunger and malnutrition in poverty-stricken areas of the United States before and after the implementation of nutrition and food stamp programs.They concluded that the programs
A) actually made the situation worse because it encouraged people to become dependent on government handouts which were discontinued when the funding ran out halfway through the fiscal year.
B) had not made much difference in hunger and malnutrition because of bureaucratic misapplication -- too much aid was given to people who did not really need it and too little was given to people who really did need it.
C) helped many and reduced hunger and malnutrition by about half but needed to be expanded to help more.
D) virtually eliminated hunger and made it difficult to find much evidence of the malnutrition identified in the earlier study.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: The Earned Income Tax Credit
A)exempts a certain
Q23: The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation
Q24: Welfare,food stamps,and social services make up about
Q25: On average,mothers receiving welfare work _ all
Q26: Two important values in the United States
Q28: The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation
Q29: Family Impact Analysis refers to
A)the impact new
Q30: Workfare
A)jobs are required to provide health benefits.
B)jobs
Q31: Women who received welfare as children are
Q32: When comparing men and women who were
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents