A Lawyer Defending a Client Whose DNA Evidence Supports His

A lawyer defending a client whose DNA evidence supports his innocence even though an eyewitness puts the client at the scene of the crime:

A) has a good case if she introduces evidence about the unreliability of eyewitness testimony.
B) has some hope because those two kinds of evidence are about equally valid.
C) should try to make a deal because juries simply don't accept DNA evidence.
D) should point out to the jury that eyewitness testimony is unreliable, unless the witness is absolutely sure about what was seen.