In _____________,the court expanded the practitioner's duty to warn those in danger to include the circumstance in which a family member communicates to a mental health practitioner a belief that the client poses a risk of grave bodily injury to another person.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Ewing v. Goldstein expanded the duty to warn to include situations where a family member communicates a belief that the client poses a risk of grave bodily injury to another person, building on the principles established in Tarasoff v. Board of Regents of the University of California.

In _____________,The Court Expanded the Practitioner's Duty to Warn Those