Armand,who previously had no reason to believe he was in poor health,crashed his truck into a parked car after unexpectedly fainting at the wheel.Under these circumstances,why might the owner of the damaged vehicle be prevented from recovering compensation from Armand?
A) The type of damages was not reasonably foreseeable.
B) Armand has insurance and therefore is protected from being sued.
C) No tort has been committed by Armand.
D) Armand owes no duty of care in these circumstances.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Armand may not have committed a tort if the fainting was sudden and unforeseeable, as this could be considered an involuntary act, thus lacking the intent or negligence required for liability.

Armand,who Previously Had No Reason to Believe He Was in Poor