Casia,who had always been in good health,suffered a heart attack while driving her car and crashed into a pedestrian who in turn suffered serious personal injuries as a result of being struck.Which statement best describes the most likely outcome?
A) The type of damages was not reasonably foreseeable.
B) Casio has insurance and therefore is protected from being sued.
C) No tort has been committed by Casia.
D) Casio owes no duty of care in these circumstances.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Casia did not commit a tort because the heart attack was a sudden and unforeseen medical emergency, which means she did not act negligently.

Casia,who Had Always Been in Good Health,suffered a Heart Attack