In the R. v. Fearon case, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that police are able to search digital devices without a warrant subject to certain conditions. Which of the following is NOT a condition to search someone's phone?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Fearon did not allow unrestricted access to all data on a phone, such as viewing all emails, texts, photographs, or call logs without specific limitations or conditions. The decision emphasized a balance between the privacy rights of individuals and the law enforcement duties of the police, allowing searches within certain constraints but not an unfettered access to all information on a device.

In the R V