Martin Taylor purchased an electric shaver for cash from the Arco Department Store for $125.95. The following manufacturer's statement was printed on a tag attached to the razor: "Warranted for ninety days from date of purchase against original factory imperfections in materials and workmanship." Taylor took the razor for a slight adjustment two weeks after he bought it. He expressed some concern about the short warranty period of ninety days offered by the manufacturer. The store manager replied, "Don't worry, I will give you an additional store warranty of one year against all defects and, if necessary, will replace the razor with a new one." This statement by the store manager would be
A) binding, because an oral warranty given after a sales contract is valid without consideration if Taylor can prove that it was given.
B) binding, because it is based on common usage in the trade, and most razors carry such a guarantee.
C) not binding, because it is based upon past consideration.
D) not binding, because the store manager's statement is mere sales talk or "puffing.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: An express warranty to be valid must
Q24: The implied warranty of merchantability does not
Q25: Quinby ordered a snowplow, specifying that it
Q26: The test of merchantability in the case
Q27: Wilson went to the Costal Camera Co.
Q29: For a statement made by a seller
Q30: According to the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, which
Q31: Below are four statements made by salespeople
Q32: Under the UCC the seller may add
Q33: Which of the following warranties can be
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents