In an action in negligence, in deciding whether a breach of duty caused a particular harm, the judge must be satisfied:
A) That there was no contributory negligence by the plaintiff.
B) That there was factual causation and that the scope of liability extends to the particular harm.
C) That the plaintiff did not voluntarily assume the risk.
D) That the harm suffered was not insignificant.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: In deciding whether the salient features of
Q8: A person who has carelessly caused harm
Q9: Which of the following statements is not
Q9: The High Court decided in the decision
Q12: Which of the following scenarios is not
Q14: In relation to the tort of negligence
Q15: The 'neighbour principle' formulated in the decision
Q16: Whether a defendant owes a duty of
Q17: In an action in negligence, once the
Q18: In order to establish negligence, the plaintiff
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents