Larson & Son manufactured welders that frequently malfunctioned, setting clothing on fire and causing serious burns.Larson & Son sold all of its assets to Swenson Co., which continued to manufacture the Larson welder product line.Eighteen months after Swenson's purchase, one of Larson's customers sued Swenson for injuries caused by a welder purchased from Larson, one year prior to the purchase by Swenson.Under the circumstances, Swenson Co.:
A) cannot be held liable, because it is a corporation.
B) cannot be held liable, because it did not manufacture the welder in question.
C) might be held liable for this debt in some states under strict tort liability.
D) could not be liable if Larson & Son still existed as a corporate entity.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q41: Which of the following is true of
Q44: Appraisal rights:
A) belong to dissident shareholders.
B) can
Q46: The Revised Act permits the board of
Q50: A court may dissolve a corporation in
Q51: Which of the following statements about corporate
Q52: A short-form merger:
A) is not a merger
Q54: A compulsory share exchange:
A) is a transaction
Q56: Which of the following is a prerequisite
Q57: A consolidation:
A) has precisely the same result
Q60: A corporation may accomplish acquiring all or
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents