Lucinda is the sole shareholder and president of NailCo, a corporation that owns a chain of nail and pedicure salons in the lower mainland of British Columbia. She visits most of NailCo's outlets weekly. She comes to you, her lawyer, to confess that over the past few months she has witnessed several of NailCo's employees dump nail polish down the drain on a number of occasions. Lucinda is now concerned that she and NailCo may be liable for the environmental consequences of these actions even though she personally did nothing. You would most likely advise Lucinda that
A) she will have to comply with provincial legislation in future.
B) the corporation may be held liable for the environmental damage caused by its agents and employees in the course of their duties and that the corporation only has a due diligence defence if someone, like Lucinda, who is a directing mind and will of the corporation took reasonable steps to avoid the offence.
C) the company is not vicariously liable for the environmental damage caused by its agents and employees.
D) Lucinda should sue her employees.
E) she should do nothing. Lucinda is not answerable for the independent actions of her staff.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q15: Federal legislation always prevails over provincial legislation.
Q33: The Ether Store Inc is trying to
Q34: Government regulation of business involves recognition of
Q35: Kimo runs a chain of health- food
Q36: Low- Valu Inc owns and operates a
Q37: A comfort or no- action letter
A) is
Q39: Primex is a discount broker with offices
Q40: The threshold for pre- merger notification in
Q43: H2O Canada Inc is a Burnaby- based
Q63: Who regulates the environment in Canada?
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents