Andrew negligently hit a dog, which lay stunned in the street for a moment and then ran toward Bill, a bystander, and bit him.In this case:
A) the dog's action is a foreseeable cause of harm.
B) the dog's action is a superseding cause of harm.
C) Andrew will be liable to Bill, because the dog's behavior is a natural consequence of the situation caused by Andrew's negligence.
D) the dog's owner will be held strictly liable for Bill's injuries, but Andrew will be liable to the dog's owner.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q61: Conduct on the part of the plaintiff
Q63: Defenses to an action in strict liability
Q64: A form of strict liability applies to
Q65: Sarah goes to Marlin's Seafood Restaurant for
Q65: Perry is injured on the job at
Q66: Adam doesn't like having neighborhood teenagers walk
Q70: The harshness of the contributory negligence doctrine
Q70: William, who is a waiter, is injured
Q73: Violation of a statute designed to protect
Q75: In determining the duty of care owed
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents