Julia Staines entered into an agreement with Cellco for the provision of a cell phone. The agreement which she signed provided as follows:
Late payment charge increase
Due to an increase in the prime interest rate, effective January
1, 2008, Cellco increased the amount it charges on overdue
Accounts to 1.25% per month or 16.07% per year.
Julia had possession of the cell phone for only three months when she started missing the due dates for payment of the charges she incurred. Julia decided to review her statement from Cellco and saw that she was being charged interest of 1.25% per month. She has decided to challenge the amount charged for interest in Court. Which of the following statements applies to the situation?
A) no interest should be charged on her account
B) the rate of interest charged is legal
C) the rate of interest charged breaches the Canada Criminal Code
D) the rate of interest cannot exceed the prime interest rate
E) this rate of interest would be considered a penalty
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q31: Which of the following assists a purchaser
Q32: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
Q33: In the two cases of Trigg and
Q34: Sal needs an apartment desperately because he
Q35: The key difference between a deposit and
Q37: Which of the following is NOT a
Q38: Another name for an exemption clause is:
A)An
Q39: Which of the following statements is FALSE?
Q40: Which of the following will be used
Q41: Monte Miller buys a television from Discount
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents