Gaston bought a toaster made by Robinson Electric Co. One day while using the toaster, it exploded causing him to sustain serious injury. The accident occurred either as a result of faulty parts supplied by the parts manufacturer, negligent assembly by the toaster manufacturer or negligent handling by the local retailer. Gaston sued Robinson Electric, the parts manufacturer and the local retailer for his injuries. Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A) There will be a presumption that the manufacturer is responsible for the injuries caused.
B) Gaston has to prove specifically which of the three companies was responsible for the defect causing his injuries.
C) If each of the three defendant are unable to prove which one of them was responsible for the accident, none of them can be held liable.
D) If each of the three defendants are unable to prove which one of them was responsible for the accident, they may all be held equally liable.
E) Gaston can sue only the manufacturer of the toaster.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: With respect to the legal principles concerning
Q26: What is the justification for the courts
Q27: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q28: Which of the following statements about the
Q29: Nikolaus was driving his car negligently and
Q31: Trang Phan ran a stop sign and
Q32: Which of the following is the best
Q33: In which of the following situations could
Q34: In an effort to help one of
Q35: Which of the following cannot be used
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents