Simon Liu is landlord of the location rented by Jones Ltd., which carries on business as a hardware store. Jones is in arrears of rent for 20 days in the sum of $1,000. The store inventory is worth $15,000. On the 21st day Liu changes the locks and seizes the entire inventory. He sells it for $15,000, and pays the balance - after deducting $1,000 for rent and $500 for expenses - to Jones. Was this seizure lawful?
A) No, because Liu changed the locks and prevented Jones access to the premises.
B) No, because Liu seized an excessive amount in relation to the rent due.
C) Yes, because there were rent arrears and more than 15 days had passed.
D) Yes, because Liu sold the goods for the best price and his expenses were not excessive.
E) both A and B
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: Pamela Lafontaine had a newsstand at the
Q24: What is the legal name for the
Q25: Which of the following will NOT determine
Q26: Ludwig is a tenant of a commercial
Q27: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A)the
Q29: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A)By
Q30: Which of the following is a criteria
Q31: When a property has more than one
Q32: Ava Handel rents a store for her
Q33: Brady West signed a lease with Harold
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents