The main ratio decidendi (reason for the decision)in the Snail in the bottle case was:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The main ratio decidendi in the Snail in the bottle case was that the defendant (manufacturer of the drink) had breached their duty of care by failing to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that they could reasonably foresee could cause loss or injury to the plaintiff (consumer who found the snail in the drink). The ruling established the principle of negligence in tort law, which states that individuals and organizations have a legal duty to take reasonable care to avoid causing harm to others. Option A is a bit too broad and doesn't fully capture the specific principle established in this case. Option C is too specific and only applies to the facts of this particular case, rather than a broader principle.

The Main Ratio Decidendi (Reason for the Decision)in the Snail