In Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1933] the plaintiff proved that the defendant had breached which provision of the Sale of Goods Act?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The plaintiff in Grant v Australian Knitting Mills proved that the defendant had breached the implied condition that goods must be reasonably fit for their purpose. This is because the plaintiff had suffered from an itchy rash due to a chemical irritant in the underwear that the defendant had sold to them. The court held that this was a breach of the implied condition that the goods were reasonably fit for their purpose as underwear, and the defendant was liable for the plaintiff's damages.

In Grant V Australian Knitting Mills [1933] the Plaintiff Proved