The Court held in Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company that:
A) the advertisement was an offer to the whole world but the offeree had not communicated acceptance.
B) the advertisement was an offer to the whole world and was accepted by the offeree when the product was bought and used.
C) the offeror was liable to the offeree for deceptive and misleading conduct.
D) the advertisement was NOT an offer to the whole world.It was really a puff.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: Under common law,when contracting parties agree to
Q12: An offer has been made and accepted
Q13: Julie posts a letter to Ruth offering
Q14: Ms Armstrong wanted to buy some furniture
Q15: In The Crown v Clarke what legal
Q17: Which of the following is NOT one
Q18: Under contract law acceptance of an offer
Q19: Which of the following statements about an
Q20: A offered to sell a painting to
Q21: Which of the following is not a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents