In a study of the effects of rewards on learning in rats, an experimenter divided 20 rats into 4 groups of equal sizes. Each rat was run through a maze, and there was only one correct method of exiting the maze. The rats were rewarded on different schedules. The investigators observed the number of trials it took the rats to learn the maze.
Group A: The rats were rewarded for every correct direction chosen in the maze
Group B: The rats were randomly rewarded 75% of the time
Group C: The rats were randomly rewarded 25% of the time
Group D: The rats were not rewarded at all.
The following table contains summary information for this experiment.
a) Construct the appropriate ANOVA table and test the hypothesis that there is no difference between the mean number of trials needed to learn the maze for the different reward treatments.
b) Is there evidence that the 25% random reward schedule and the 75% random reward schedule result in a different mean number of trials to learn the maze? Give statistical evidence to support your answer.
Correct Answer:
Verified
1: Let μ1, μ2, μ3, μ4 be the true mean n...
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q26: The following Tukey-Kramer summary is from a
Q27: The following partial ANOVA table was based
Q28: The following partial ANOVA table was based
Q29: In a study of the effects of
Q30: Briefly explain how to check the assumption
Q32: A veterinarian is studying three different medications
Q33: A dairy scientist is studying three different
Q34: If the line segments in an interaction
Q35: Nutritionists study the impact of four different
Q36: The supermarket chain chooses a new logo
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents