In the McKennon v.Nashville Banner Publishing Co.case referenced in the text,after-acquired evidence of the plaintiff-employee's misconduct was introduced in a lawsuit filed under the ADEA.How did the U.S.Supreme Court rule?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that after-acquired evidence of an employee's misconduct can limit remedies available to the plaintiff under the ADEA to back pay only and exclude reinstatement or front pay. However, the court also noted that this rule was not absolute and that there may be exceptional cases where reinstatement or front pay is appropriate.

In the McKennon V