
The King Surety Company wrote a general fidelity bond covering defalcations by the employees of Wilson,Inc.Thereafter,Cooney,an employee of Wilson,embezzled $17 200 of company funds.When the activities were discovered,King paid Wilson the full amount in accordance with the terms of the fidelity bond,and then sought recovery against Wilson's auditors,Lynch & Merritt,public accountants.Which of the following would be Lynch & Merritt's best defence?
A) King is not in privity of contract.
B) The shortages were the result of clever forgeries and collusive fraud which would not be detected by an examination made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
C) Lynch & Merritt were not guilty of either negligence or fraud.
D) Lynch & Merritt were not aware of the King-Wilson surety relationship.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q73: While performing services for their clients,professionals have
Q74: To succeed in an action against the
Q75: In the auditing environment,failure to meet generally
Q76: In rare cases,auditors have been held liable
Q77: The principal issue to be resolved in
Q79: It is not practical for users to
Q80: PA was engaged by Microcomputer Distributor Limited
Q81: A)List the four items a defendant must
Q82: Winston Chang,a PA,conducted the audit of Manra
Q83: Fabio recently sold his restaurant for $650
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents