In those states that have adopted comparative negligence, the plaintiff can recover even if a jury determines the plaintiff was 70 percent responsible for his or her own injuries under a comparative negligence standard but cannot recover under a approach. Under the latter approach, if a jury assigns a 50-50 apportionment in terms of blame, a plaintiff cannot recover under the approach but can recover under the approach.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q6: The only rationale behind contributory negligence is
Q7: The 50 percent approach is problematic when
Q8: Under the doctrine, a defendant remains liable
Q9: The last clear chance doctrine is inapplicable
Q10: Contributory negligence is not a defense if
Q12: The question of contributory negligence is a
Q13: A defendant who is negligent per se
Q14: and are two types of public officials
Q15: Proximate cause is always construed more narrowly
Q16: The biggest question surrounding statutes of limitations
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents