In Hansen Trust v. SCM the court concluded:
A) Merrill Lynch was given favorable treatment
B) Use of lockup option was inappropriate
C) An appropriate auction was preempted
D) All the above
E) None of the above

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Hansen Trust v. SCM, the court concluded that Merrill Lynch was given favorable treatment, the use of a lockup option was inappropriate, and an appropriate auction was preempted, making all the provided options correct.

In Hansen Trust V. SCM the Court Concluded