[New Furniture] Kristin Purchased $2,000 Worth of Furniture from Solid

[New Furniture] Kristin purchased $2,000 worth of furniture from Solid Wood Furniture. Through an arrangement with Solid Wood, Kristin financed the purchase through a financing company called Let Us Help You. Twenty-nine days after the goods were delivered to her, Kristin had a disagreement with Let Us Help You regarding the amount of interest she would be required to pay. She notified Solid Wood on that day that she was rejecting the goods. Solid Wood claimed that she did not properly reject the furniture and also that she failed to act in good faith, an obligation imposed equally on all parties to a transaction. Kristin says that she properly rejected; that, although the UCC imposes no duty of good faith, she acted in good faith; and that, in any event, she had an absolute right to return the goods.
-Which statement is true regarding Kristin's claim that the UCC imposes no obligation of good faith conduct?

A) Kristin is correct in this instance because while the UCC generally imposes a duty of good faith, that duty is inapplicable during the initial 30 days after a purchase when a buyer has the right to revoke acceptance for a good or a bad reason.
B) Kristin is correct in this instance because while the UCC generally imposes a duty of good faith, that duty is inapplicable in relation to third-party financing.
C) Kristin is correct only if she can establish that the goods were overpriced resulting in the right to disregard any obligation of Solid Wood.
D) Kristin is correct only if she can establish that Solid Wood Furniture itself failed to act in good faith.
E) Kristin is incorrect.