In 2003, the U.S.Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a formal complaint against a major fast food chain over what it called deceptive advertising.In television spots, the chain claimed that its fried chicken was healthier than other fast food, when compared for fat, carbohydrate, and protein content.The fast food purveyor ended up settling with the FTC, and pulling the ads.Even so, federal court long established that the agency has the power to regulate false or misleading advertising because:
A) commercial speech is not fully protected under the First Amendment, since it cannot be considered political speech.
B) the government's compelling interest in protecting the health and safety of consumers outweighs the First Amendment rights of private businesses.
C) only individuals have First Amendment rights, not businesses or corporations.
D) money spent on advertising is not considered speech.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q31: Diskou, a Haitian-American hip-hop and social media
Q32: The Fifth Amendment's proscription against depriving any
Q33: According to modern interpretation of the principle
Q34: The power of public agencies to seize
Q35: When legal scholars or constitutional law specialists
Q37: Why is commercial speech not entitled to
Q38: A written statement made in reckless disregard
Q39: What is the difference between libel and
Q40: As forbidden by the U.S.Constitution, trying a
Q41: In recent times, the mayor and council
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents