All of the following are true of the 2010 Arizona immigration law EXCEPT

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The 2010 Arizona immigration law, known as SB 1070, had several provisions, but not all were upheld by the United States Supreme Court. The Court struck down three of the four major provisions as preempted by federal law, meaning they intruded on the federal government's authority to regulate immigration. However, the provision requiring police to check the immigration status of someone they stop, detain, or arrest if they suspect the person might be in the country illegally was allowed to stand, but with the caveat that it could be subject to legal challenge if it was implemented in a manner that violated federal law. Thus, it is incorrect to say that the law was fully upheld as constitutional by the United States Supreme Court.

All of the Following Are True of the 2010 Arizona