In Medina V

In Medina v.California (1992) , the U.S.Supreme Court ruled that

A) a coerced confession is not admissible.
B) a state can require a criminal defendant to bear the burden of proof in a competence hearing.
C) competence to stand trial and competence to plead guilty are two distinct entities.
D) a standard of clear and convincing evidence is the necessary standard of proof in competency hearings.