When a state holds a resource that is available for the free use of the general public, a court will look with considerable skepticism upon any government conduct which is calculated either to reallocate that resource to more restricted uses or subject public uses to the self-interest of a private party.This statement relates to:
A) the law of eminent domain
B) the legality of exclusionary zoning ordinances.
C) the public trust doctrine.
D) the law of inverse condemnation.
E) none of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: With regard to restrictive covenants:
A)even though they
Q6: A restrictive covenant may not establish a
Q8: Even though restrictive covenants are agreements made
Q11: Carl, an avid environmentalist, sued a large
Q12: Under the rational basis test, legislation will
Q13: Inverse condemnation is used exclusively in cases
Q14: Strict liability requires proof that a landowner
Q17: Under common law dedication the public acquires
Q19: Only the United States government has the
Q20: The "rational nexus" test means that if
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents