What is the danger of researchers only reporting on the tests that came out significant (versus reporting on all the tests they conducted)?
A)If nothing interesting is happening in the population, then 1 in 20 tests are expected to achieve statistical significance just by chance.
B)The researchers could have been 'data snooping.'
C)Results that are not statistically significant give valuable information to the public as well; not just those that are statistically significant.
D)All of the above.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

If researchers only report on the tests that came out significant, they might have engaged in data snooping or may have missed reporting on relevant results that are not statistically significant. Additionally, reporting on all the tests conducted may provide important context and valuable information for the public, even if they did not produce statistically significant outcomes. It is important for researchers to be transparent in reporting and not selectively present only the significant results.

What Is the Danger of Researchers Only Reporting on the Tests