In D.D.N. v. FACE, a music-festival organizer hired a man who had a conviction for criminal sexual assault without doing a background check. The man was hired to be camping staff, front. He was given a staff T-shirt, and a wristband that gave him access to all parts of the concert venue. He sexually assaulted a concert-goer, and she sued for neghligent hiring. Although the hiring manager acknowledged an increased risk of sexual assault in that venue, the employer argued that they owed her no duty, and her injury was not foreseeable. The court ruled that:
A) the employer was liable under respondeat superior because the assault occurred on concert grounds, and was carried out by a management-level employee
B) the employer was liable for negligent hiring because employers are legally obligated to perform criminal background checks and contact references for all persons hired
C) the employer was liable for negligent hiring because sexual assault was an increased risk in this venue, it was foreseeable that an unfit person hired as for this position could harm others, and the employer failed to conduct an adequate background check
D) the employer was not liable for negligent hiring because even if it had undertaken a more thorough background check, clear evidence of unfitness for the job was not available
E) none of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A company hired a file clerk,but did
Q5: Mike is the chair of the management
Q5: The Immigration Reform and Control Act:
A) requires
Q7: In order to avoid liability for negligent
Q11: A valid background check should NOT include:
A)checking
Q12: Which of the following is true regarding
Q15: Which of the following statements is NOT
Q19: Which of the following steps could an
Q20: Which of the following is a true
Q25: While doing a background check on a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents