Which one of the following laws or regulations interprets sections of the Communications Decency Act to mean that ISPs are not responsible for malicious software transmitted over their services by hackers?
A) Digital Millennium Copyright Act (1998)
B) Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (1999)
C) CAN-SPAM Act (2003)
D) Green v. America Online (2003)

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The case of Green v. America Online (2003) interpreted sections of the Communications Decency Act in a way that ISPs (Internet Service Providers) are not held responsible for malicious software (malware) transmitted over their services by hackers. This case is significant in the context of ISP liability and the transmission of harmful content or software.

Which One of the Following Laws or Regulations Interprets Sections