Foreseeable plaintiffs theory asks:
A) Did the tortfeasor intend to injure the plaintiff?
B) Was it reasonably foreseeable that the person hurt would be injured as a result of the tortfeasor's actions?
C) Should the tortfeasor have known that his or her actions would cause a specific type of injury?
D) This concept applies to intentional torts, not negligence.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Contrary to popular belief, the largest amounts
Q2: Which of the following is not one
Q3: Breach of duty is defined as
A) legal
Q5: Which of the following is not an
Q6: Liam parked his car on a hill.
Q7: Substantial factor analysis is a form of
Q8: Proximate cause is defined in terms of
Q9: There is no duty to come to
Q10: Most negligence cases are based on
A) an
Q11: Generally, people who are mentally ill are
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents