In the case of Speelman v. Pascal , the court held that:
A) a gratuitous assignment is terminated by the assignor's death, even if the assignor made an effective delivery of the assignment prior to his death.
B) assignments of rights to sums that are expected to become due to the assignor are enforceable.
C) assignments cannot be made of sums that are not presently due but are expected to become due in the future.
D) personal contracts are not assignable.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Speelman v. Pascal, the court held that assignments of rights to sums that are expected to become due to the assignor are indeed enforceable. This case is often cited to support the principle that future payments or rights expected to arise can be legally assigned to another party.

In the Case of Speelman V