In the Bigelow-Sanford, Inc

In the Bigelow-Sanford, Inc. v. Gunny Corp. case, the court found:

A) the buyer did not purchase substitute goods in good faith and without unreasonable delay.
B) the Code permits a buyer to cover by buying substitute goods if the buyer acts in good faith and without unreasonable delay.
C) since the buyer did not specifically allocate the spot market replacements to the individual sellers' accounts, the cost of cover could not be determined in this case.
D) the buyer was required to obtain cover and its failure to do so bars other Code remedies.