Would a letter written after the execution of a contract and which contained agreements different from those in the written contract be admissible under the parol evidence rule?
A) No, because it explains the agreement.
B) No, because it contradicts the terms of the contract.
C) No, because it changes the agreement.
D) Yes, it would be admissible, because it is subsequent to the written agreement.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The parol evidence rule generally prohibits the admission of evidence of prior or contemporaneous negotiations and agreements that contradict, modify, or vary contractual terms of a written contract intended to be the complete and final expression of the parties' agreement. However, a letter written after the execution of a contract that contains different agreements can be admissible because it is subsequent to the contract, potentially representing a modification or new agreement between the parties.

Would a Letter Written After the Execution of a Contract